You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "David Smiley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/16 05:50:29 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2262) QueryParser should now allow leading
'?' wildcards
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Smiley updated LUCENE-2262:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.7)
4.8
> QueryParser should now allow leading '?' wildcards
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2262
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/queryparser
> Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.8
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2262.patch, LUCENE-2262_backwards.patch
>
>
> QueryParser currently throws an exception if a wildcard term begins with the '?' operator.
> The current documentation describes why this is:
> {noformat}
> When set, * or ? are allowed as the first character of a PrefixQuery and WildcardQuery.
> Note that this can produce very slow queries on big indexes.
> {noformat}
> In the flexible indexing branch, wildcard queries with leading '?' operator are no longer slow on big indexes (they do not enumerate terms in linear fashion).
> Thus, it no longer makes sense to throw a ParseException for a leading '?'
> So, users should be able to perform a query of "?foo" and no longer get a ParseException from the QueryParser.
> For the flexible indexing branch, wildcard queries of 'foo?', '?foo', 'f?oo', etc are all the same from a performance perspective.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org