You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> on 2020/09/22 18:59:26 UTC
[VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Hi all,
This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow
repo.
*Intended Use*:
A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
users@airflow.apache.org.
*Caveats*:
GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As
is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
dev@airflow.apache.org).
*Discussion Thread*:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
Consider this my +1 binding
Regards,
Kaxil
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>.
+1 Binding.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:59 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow
> repo.
>
> *Intended Use*:
> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
> users@airflow.apache.org.
>
> *Caveats*:
>
> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As
> is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>
>
> *Discussion Thread*:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>
> Consider this my +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
--
Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>.
Nice!
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:19 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Github Discussions have now been enabled:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/.
>
> I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack
> for asking questions so they are indexed:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11940
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>
>> I+1
>>
>> It’s hard to be subscribed to both dev@ and users@ (so. much. email.),
>> and you’d need devs subscribed to both for users to have a good experience,
>> to get their questions well-answered.
>>
>> I unsubscribed from users@ and now that is invisible to me - good for my
>> focus, bad for the users.
>>
>> A majority of Airflow users would know GitHub and have an account, and it
>> would be convenient to the devs if most questions were asked there, rather
>> than on users@ or slack - because:
>>
>> - We’re already in GitHub reviewing PRs and issues
>> - the q&a would have a permalink, and be indexed in search engines better
>> (reduce repeated questions)
>> - It’s be worthwhile to write better questions and write better answers
>> there vs on an ephemeral mailing list or slack thread
>>
>> This change would enhance UX for both devs and users.
>>
>> -Ry
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 3:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5.
>>>
>>> -ash
>>>
>>> On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <ai...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow
>>> (it was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between
>>> user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though
>>> there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub.
>>>
>>> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website
>>> with the info of where user questions need to be directed.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin <
>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> @tomek - Yup we could do that
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
>>> to GH discussion?
>>>
>>> T.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
>>> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
>>> purposes.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1.
>>> >>
>>> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
>>> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> XD
>>> >>
>>> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <
>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> via Newton Mail
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
>>> Airflow repo.
>>> >>
>>> >> Intended Use:
>>> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
>>> users@airflow.apache.org.
>>> >>
>>> >> Caveats:
>>> >>
>>> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user
>>> help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions
>>> and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
>>> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Discussion Thread:
>>> >>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>> >>
>>> >> Consider this my +1 binding
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Kaxil
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>
--
Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
Github Discussions have now been enabled:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/.
I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack
for asking questions so they are indexed:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11940
Regards,
Kaxil
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
> I+1
>
> It’s hard to be subscribed to both dev@ and users@ (so. much. email.),
> and you’d need devs subscribed to both for users to have a good experience,
> to get their questions well-answered.
>
> I unsubscribed from users@ and now that is invisible to me - good for my
> focus, bad for the users.
>
> A majority of Airflow users would know GitHub and have an account, and it
> would be convenient to the devs if most questions were asked there, rather
> than on users@ or slack - because:
>
> - We’re already in GitHub reviewing PRs and issues
> - the q&a would have a permalink, and be indexed in search engines better
> (reduce repeated questions)
> - It’s be worthwhile to write better questions and write better answers
> there vs on an ephemeral mailing list or slack thread
>
> This change would enhance UX for both devs and users.
>
> -Ry
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 3:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5.
>>
>> -ash
>>
>> On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <ai...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow (it
>> was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between
>> user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though
>> there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub.
>>
>> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website with
>> the info of where user questions need to be directed.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin <
>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> @tomek - Yup we could do that
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
>> to GH discussion?
>>
>> T.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
>> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
>> purposes.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1.
>> >>
>> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
>> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> XD
>> >>
>> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> via Newton Mail
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
>> Airflow repo.
>> >>
>> >> Intended Use:
>> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
>> users@airflow.apache.org.
>> >>
>> >> Caveats:
>> >>
>> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help.
>> As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
>> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
>> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Discussion Thread:
>> >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>> >>
>> >> Consider this my +1 binding
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Kaxil
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com>.
I+1
It’s hard to be subscribed to both dev@ and users@ (so. much. email.), and
you’d need devs subscribed to both for users to have a good experience, to
get their questions well-answered.
I unsubscribed from users@ and now that is invisible to me - good for my
focus, bad for the users.
A majority of Airflow users would know GitHub and have an account, and it
would be convenient to the devs if most questions were asked there, rather
than on users@ or slack - because:
- We’re already in GitHub reviewing PRs and issues
- the q&a would have a permalink, and be indexed in search engines better
(reduce repeated questions)
- It’s be worthwhile to write better questions and write better answers
there vs on an ephemeral mailing list or slack thread
This change would enhance UX for both devs and users.
-Ry
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 3:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5.
>
> -ash
>
> On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <ai...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow (it
> was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between
> user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though
> there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub.
>
> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website with
> the info of where user questions need to be directed.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin <
> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @tomek - Yup we could do that
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
> to GH discussion?
>
> T.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
> purposes.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >> XD
> >>
> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> via Newton Mail
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
> Airflow repo.
> >>
> >> Intended Use:
> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
> users@airflow.apache.org.
> >>
> >> Caveats:
> >>
> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help.
> As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
> dev@airflow.apache.org).
> >>
> >>
> >> Discussion Thread:
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> Consider this my +1 binding
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kaxil
> >>
> >>
>
> --
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github
Repo
Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5.
-ash
On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <ai...@apache.org> wrote:
> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow (it was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub.
>
> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website with the info of where user questions need to be directed.
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin <maximebeauchemin@gmail.com (mailto:maximebeauchemin@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com (mailto:kaxilnaik@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > @tomek - Yup we could do that
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbaszek@apache.org (mailto:turbaszek@apache.org)> wrote:
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
> > > > to GH discussion?
> > > >
> > > > T.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
> > > > <whatwouldaustindo@gmail.com (mailto:whatwouldaustindo@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended purposes.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.deng.r@gmail.com (mailto:xd.deng.r@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already clarified well in the earlier discussion.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> XD
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <daniel.imberman@gmail.com (mailto:daniel.imberman@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> via Newton Mail
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@apache.org (mailto:kaxilnaik@apache.org)> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow repo.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Intended Use:
> > > > >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of users@airflow.apache.org (mailto:users@airflow.apache.org).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Caveats:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (dev@airflow.apache.org (mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org)).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Discussion Thread:
> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Consider this my +1 binding
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Kaxil
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <ai...@apache.org>.
-0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow (it
was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between
user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though
there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub.
Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website with
the info of where user questions need to be directed.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> @tomek - Yup we could do that
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
>>> to GH discussion?
>>>
>>> T.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
>>> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
>>> purposes.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1.
>>> >>
>>> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
>>> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> XD
>>> >>
>>> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <
>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> via Newton Mail
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
>>> Airflow repo.
>>> >>
>>> >> Intended Use:
>>> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
>>> users@airflow.apache.org.
>>> >>
>>> >> Caveats:
>>> >>
>>> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user
>>> help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions
>>> and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
>>> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Discussion Thread:
>>> >>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>> >>
>>> >> Consider this my +1 binding
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Kaxil
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Maxime Beauchemin <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @tomek - Yup we could do that
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
>> to GH discussion?
>>
>> T.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
>> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
>> purposes.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1.
>> >>
>> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
>> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> XD
>> >>
>> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> via Newton Mail
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
>> Airflow repo.
>> >>
>> >> Intended Use:
>> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
>> users@airflow.apache.org.
>> >>
>> >> Caveats:
>> >>
>> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help.
>> As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
>> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
>> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Discussion Thread:
>> >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>> >>
>> >> Consider this my +1 binding
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Kaxil
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
@tomek - Yup we could do that
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
> to GH discussion?
>
> T.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
> <wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
> purposes.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already
> clarified well in the earlier discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >> XD
> >>
> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> via Newton Mail
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache
> Airflow repo.
> >>
> >> Intended Use:
> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
> users@airflow.apache.org.
> >>
> >> Caveats:
> >>
> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help.
> As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
> dev@airflow.apache.org).
> >>
> >>
> >> Discussion Thread:
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> Consider this my +1 binding
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kaxil
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point
to GH discussion?
T.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett
<wh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended purposes.
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already clarified well in the earlier discussion.
>>
>>
>> XD
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> via Newton Mail
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow repo.
>>
>> Intended Use:
>> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of users@airflow.apache.org.
>>
>> Caveats:
>>
>> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (dev@airflow.apache.org).
>>
>>
>> Discussion Thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>
>> Consider this my +1 binding
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kaxil
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Austin Bennett <wh...@gmail.com>.
+1
just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended
purposes.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already clarified
> well in the earlier discussion.
>
>
> XD
>
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> via Newton Mail
> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow
> repo.
>
> *Intended Use*:
> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
> users@airflow.apache.org.
>
> *Caveats*:
>
> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As
> is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
> project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
> dev@airflow.apache.org).
>
>
> *Discussion Thread*:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>
> Consider this my +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>.
+1.
I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already clarified well in the earlier discussion.
XD
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> via Newton Mail <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow repo.
>
> Intended Use:
> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of users@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>.
>
> Caveats:
>
> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (dev@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>).
>
>
> Discussion Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E>
>
> Consider this my +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
Re: [VOTE] Enable Github Discussions on Apache Airflow Github Repo
Posted by Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
via Newton Mail
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi all,
This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache Airflow
repo.
Intended Use : A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of
users@airflow.apache.org [users@airflow.apache.org] .
Caveats :
GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user help. As
is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions and
project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list (
dev@airflow.apache.org [dev@airflow.apache.org] ).
Discussion Thread :
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
[https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E]
Consider this my +1 binding
Regards, Kaxil