You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch> on 2006/02/06 10:51:34 UTC
fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Hello list.
I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
with many other features.
So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
0.91beta in production environment.
Best regards.
--
Robi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch>.
Thank you. And that work on 0.20.5, too. But I'll try anyway
to move to 0.91beta soon. I've noticed that 0.91beta correctly
shows partial totals in bold, while 0.20.5 doesn't.
Best regards.
--
Robi
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. What you're looking for is
> display-align="after". vertical-align is for the alignment of boxes
> inside a line area not inside a table-cell.
>
> On 06.02.2006 18:03:44 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>
>>Thank you Jeremias, that solves the problem.
>>
>>But even using 0.91beta, I cannot align table-cell
>>content to the bottom of the cell.
>>
>>I would expect that the following:
>>
>><table-cell padding="4mm 1mm 0mm 1mm"
>> margin="0mm"
>> vertical-align="bottom">
>> <block>m2</block>
>></table-cell>
>>
>>would align the table-cell content to the bottom, but
>>it doesn't..
>>
>>Again, the complete source FO document used is available at:
>>http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
>>
>>Any ideas?
>
> <snip/>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
Sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. What you're looking for is
display-align="after". vertical-align is for the alignment of boxes
inside a line area not inside a table-cell.
On 06.02.2006 18:03:44 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Thank you Jeremias, that solves the problem.
>
> But even using 0.91beta, I cannot align table-cell
> content to the bottom of the cell.
>
> I would expect that the following:
>
> <table-cell padding="4mm 1mm 0mm 1mm"
> margin="0mm"
> vertical-align="bottom">
> <block>m2</block>
> </table-cell>
>
> would align the table-cell content to the bottom, but
> it doesn't..
>
> Again, the complete source FO document used is available at:
> http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
>
> Any ideas?
<snip/>
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch>.
Thank you Jeremias, that solves the problem.
But even using 0.91beta, I cannot align table-cell
content to the bottom of the cell.
I would expect that the following:
<table-cell padding="4mm 1mm 0mm 1mm"
margin="0mm"
vertical-align="bottom">
<block>m2</block>
</table-cell>
would align the table-cell content to the bottom, but
it doesn't..
Again, the complete source FO document used is available at:
http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
Any ideas?
Best regards.
--
Robi
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Interesting. It's caused by the "title" element under the page-sequence.
> If you comment it, the problem goes away. I will have to take a closer
> look to find out what's going on.
>
> On 06.02.2006 12:53:30 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>
>>Hello.
>>
>>I just gave a try at 0.91beta and I get a null pointer exception:
>>
>>E:\soft\apache\fop-0.91beta>.\fop.bat -fo offerta.xml -pdf offerta.pdf
>>Exception
>>java.lang.NullPointerException
>>
>>The very same file, can be parsed successfully with 0.20.5
>>
>>E:\soft\apache\fop-0.20.5>.\fop.bat -fo ..\fop-0.91beta\offerta.xml -pdf
>>offerta.pdf
>>[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
>>[INFO] FOP 0.20.5
>>[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
>>[INFO] building formatting object tree
>>[INFO] setting up fonts
>>[INFO] [1]
>>[INFO] [2]
>>[INFO] [3]
>>[INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer
>>
>>The source FO document used is available at:
>>http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
>>
>>Any ideas?
>>
>>Best regards.
>>--
>>Robi
>>
>>
>>Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>>
>>>Thank you Jeremias.
>>>
>>>I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy
>>>0.91beta to the production environment.
>>>After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction
>>>related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the
>>>production environment.
>>>
>>>Best regards.
>>>--
>>>Robi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
>>>>very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
>>>>still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
>>>>usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
>>>>replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
>>>>
>>>>At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
>>>>release. :-)
>>>>
>>>>On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
>>>>>bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
>>>>>it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
>>>>>with many other features.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
>>>>>that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
>>>>>adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
>>>>>now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
>>>>>0.91beta in production environment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jeremias Maerki
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
Interesting. It's caused by the "title" element under the page-sequence.
If you comment it, the problem goes away. I will have to take a closer
look to find out what's going on.
On 06.02.2006 12:53:30 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just gave a try at 0.91beta and I get a null pointer exception:
>
> E:\soft\apache\fop-0.91beta>.\fop.bat -fo offerta.xml -pdf offerta.pdf
> Exception
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>
> The very same file, can be parsed successfully with 0.20.5
>
> E:\soft\apache\fop-0.20.5>.\fop.bat -fo ..\fop-0.91beta\offerta.xml -pdf
> offerta.pdf
> [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
> [INFO] FOP 0.20.5
> [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
> [INFO] building formatting object tree
> [INFO] setting up fonts
> [INFO] [1]
> [INFO] [2]
> [INFO] [3]
> [INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer
>
> The source FO document used is available at:
> http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Best regards.
> --
> Robi
>
>
> Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> > Thank you Jeremias.
> >
> > I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy
> > 0.91beta to the production environment.
> > After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction
> > related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the
> > production environment.
> >
> > Best regards.
> > --
> > Robi
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >
> >> In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
> >> very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
> >> still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
> >> usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
> >> replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
> >>
> >> At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
> >> release. :-)
> >>
> >> On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> >>
> >>> I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
> >>> bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
> >>> it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
> >>> with many other features.
> >>>
> >>> So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
> >>> that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
> >>> adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
> >>> now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
> >>> 0.91beta in production environment.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeremias Maerki
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch>.
Hello.
I just gave a try at 0.91beta and I get a null pointer exception:
E:\soft\apache\fop-0.91beta>.\fop.bat -fo offerta.xml -pdf offerta.pdf
Exception
java.lang.NullPointerException
The very same file, can be parsed successfully with 0.20.5
E:\soft\apache\fop-0.20.5>.\fop.bat -fo ..\fop-0.91beta\offerta.xml -pdf
offerta.pdf
[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
[INFO] FOP 0.20.5
[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
[INFO] building formatting object tree
[INFO] setting up fonts
[INFO] [1]
[INFO] [2]
[INFO] [3]
[INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer
The source FO document used is available at:
http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
Any ideas?
Best regards.
--
Robi
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Thank you Jeremias.
>
> I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy
> 0.91beta to the production environment.
> After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction
> related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the
> production environment.
>
> Best regards.
> --
> Robi
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
>> very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
>> still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
>> usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
>> replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
>>
>> At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
>> release. :-)
>>
>> On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
>>> bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
>>> it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
>>> with many other features.
>>>
>>> So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
>>> that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
>>> adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
>>> now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
>>> 0.91beta in production environment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeremias Maerki
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch>.
Thank you Jeremias.
I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy
0.91beta to the production environment.
After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction
related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the
production environment.
Best regards.
--
Robi
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
> very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
> still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
> usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
> replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
>
> At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
> release. :-)
>
> On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>
>>I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
>>bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
>>it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
>>with many other features.
>>
>>So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
>>that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
>>adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
>>now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
>>0.91beta in production environment.
>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
release. :-)
On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
> bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
> it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
> with many other features.
>
> So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
> that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
> adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
> now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
> 0.91beta in production environment.
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org