[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-3391) Extensions by restrictions and unwrapping

["Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550013 ] 

Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi commented on AXIS2-3391:
-----------------------------------------------------

Unwrapping another level is bit difficult thing to do. 
Your type is generated in the default package since you have not given elementFormDefault="qualified" in your schema.

> Extensions by restrictions and unwrapping
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AXIS2-3391
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3391
>             Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: codegen
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Mauro Molinari
>            Assignee: Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi
>
> Suppose you have the following WSDL:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
> <wsdl:definitions xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/ProvaRestriction/" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" name="ProvaRestriction" targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/ProvaRestriction/">
>   <wsdl:types>
>     <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/ProvaRestriction/">
>       <xsd:element name="operation">
>         <xsd:complexType>
>           <xsd:sequence>
>             <xsd:element name="in">
>               <xsd:simpleType>
>                 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int">
>                   <xsd:minInclusive value="1"></xsd:minInclusive>
>                 </xsd:restriction>
>               </xsd:simpleType>
>             </xsd:element>
>           </xsd:sequence>
>         </xsd:complexType>
>       </xsd:element>
>       <xsd:element name="operationResponse">
>         <xsd:complexType>
>           <xsd:sequence>
>             <xsd:element name="out" type="xsd:string"/>
>           </xsd:sequence>
>         </xsd:complexType>
>       </xsd:element>
>     </xsd:schema>
>   </wsdl:types>
>   <wsdl:message name="operationRequest">
>     <wsdl:part element="tns:operation" name="parameters"/>
>   </wsdl:message>
>   <wsdl:message name="operationResponse">
>     <wsdl:part element="tns:operationResponse" name="parameters"/>
>   </wsdl:message>
>   <wsdl:portType name="ProvaRestriction">
>     <wsdl:operation name="operation">
>       <wsdl:input message="tns:operationRequest"/>
>       <wsdl:output message="tns:operationResponse"/>
>     </wsdl:operation>
>   </wsdl:portType>
>   <wsdl:binding name="ProvaChoiceSOAP" type="tns:ProvaRestriction">
>     <soap:binding style="document"
>       transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
>     <wsdl:operation name="operation">
>       <soap:operation
>         soapAction="http://www.example.org/ProvaChoice/operation" />
>       <wsdl:input>
>         <soap:body use="literal" />
>       </wsdl:input>
>       <wsdl:output>
>         <soap:body use="literal" />
>       </wsdl:output>
>     </wsdl:operation>
>   </wsdl:binding>
>   <wsdl:service name="ProvaRestriction">
>     <wsdl:port binding="tns:ProvaChoiceSOAP" name="ProvaRestrictionSOAP">
>       <soap:address location="http://www.example.org/"/>
>     </wsdl:port>
>   </wsdl:service>
> </wsdl:definitions>
> Try to call WSDL2Java on this WSDL, generating the server side code and using unwrapping (-uw) option. The method generated in the skeleton for operation named "operation" is the following:
> public java.lang.String operation(org.example.www.provarestriction.In_type1 in)
> This is quite ugly, I think... I would expect to find:
> public java.lang.String operation(int in)
> because the type of the "in" element is just a restriction for xsd:int stating that the value must be >= 1.
> I know that unwrapping goes just 1 level deep to unwrap parameters, but I think that in some cases (like this one) it should go further...
> Moreover, I can't understand why a class named In_type0 is generated in the default (unnamed) package, while it seems not to be used anywhere...
> Mauro.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org