You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/17 04:05:52 UTC

More svn merge testing

Ok so I've come up with something else about the svn merge output.
Here is my test procedure (note that I am doing this from my hacked on
version of the merge-tracking sample repo).

* svn cp -r 8 //trunk //branches/f
  (commited r27)
* In //branches/f working copy:
   * cd products
   * svn merge -g && svn ci  (pretty much grabs r14, including adding
a file: roadmap.html)
   * cd ..
   * svn merge -g -c 14
     A    products/roadmap.html
     U    about/index.html
     U    index.html
     U    news/index.html
     G   .
   * svn st
      M     .
     M      about/index.html
     M      index.html
     M      news/index.html

So it makes since that after all the merging the roadmap.html was already
present and therefore had no modifications.  I just thought that it maybe
shouldn't show up as an "add" in the merge output.  Might be a little
confusing.

Troy

-- 
Beware of spyware. If you can, use the Firefox browser. - USA Today
Download now at http://getfirefox.com
Registered Linux User #354814 ( http://counter.li.org/)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org


Re: More svn merge testing

Posted by Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com>.
On 10/19/07, David Glasser <gl...@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok so I've come up with something else about the svn merge output.
> > Here is my test procedure (note that I am doing this from my hacked on
> > version of the merge-tracking sample repo).
> >
> > * svn cp -r 8 //trunk //branches/f
> >   (commited r27)
> > * In //branches/f working copy:
> >    * cd products
> >    * svn merge -g && svn ci  (pretty much grabs r14, including adding
> > a file: roadmap.html)
> >    * cd ..
> >    * svn merge -g -c 14
> >      A    products/roadmap.html
> >      U    about/index.html
> >      U    index.html
> >      U    news/index.html
> >      G   .
> >    * svn st
> >       M     .
> >      M      about/index.html
> >      M      index.html
> >      M      news/index.html
> >
> > So it makes since that after all the merging the roadmap.html was already
> > present and therefore had no modifications.  I just thought that it maybe
> > shouldn't show up as an "add" in the merge output.  Might be a little
> > confusing.
>
> Is this the same thing being discussed in the thread
> "Incorrect/confusing merge notification"?
>
> --dave
>
> --
> David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
>

Yep it does appear to be the same.  I didn't notice that other thread.
-- 
"Beware of spyware. If you can, use the Firefox browser." - USA Today
Download now at http://getfirefox.com
Registered Linux User #354814 ( http://counter.li.org/)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: More svn merge testing

Posted by David Glasser <gl...@davidglasser.net>.
On 10/16/07, Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok so I've come up with something else about the svn merge output.
> Here is my test procedure (note that I am doing this from my hacked on
> version of the merge-tracking sample repo).
>
> * svn cp -r 8 //trunk //branches/f
>   (commited r27)
> * In //branches/f working copy:
>    * cd products
>    * svn merge -g && svn ci  (pretty much grabs r14, including adding
> a file: roadmap.html)
>    * cd ..
>    * svn merge -g -c 14
>      A    products/roadmap.html
>      U    about/index.html
>      U    index.html
>      U    news/index.html
>      G   .
>    * svn st
>       M     .
>      M      about/index.html
>      M      index.html
>      M      news/index.html
>
> So it makes since that after all the merging the roadmap.html was already
> present and therefore had no modifications.  I just thought that it maybe
> shouldn't show up as an "add" in the merge output.  Might be a little
> confusing.

Is this the same thing being discussed in the thread
"Incorrect/confusing merge notification"?

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org