You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)" <se...@james.apache.org> on 2008/12/14 17:05:44 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JAMES-882) VirtualUserTable-Store is not working
anymore
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656401#action_12656401 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-882:
---------------------------------------------
isLocalEmail does not correctly take VUT into account so I think VUT support should be removed from LocalDelivery.
> VirtualUserTable-Store is not working anymore
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-882
> Project: JAMES Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0, Trunk
> Reporter: Norman Maurer
> Assignee: Norman Maurer
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: vut-support.diff
>
>
> In current trunk the VirtualUserTable-Store implementation get never called from a mailet to rewrite recipients.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-882) VirtualUserTable-Store is not working
anymore
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA) ha scritto:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656401#action_12656401 ]
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-882:
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> isLocalEmail does not correctly take VUT into account so I think VUT support should be removed from LocalDelivery.
I don't understand this. LocalDelivery has no code, it is NOW a
composition of 2 mailets.
LocalDelivery exists to provide backward compatibility. If you need a
LocalDelivery without the VUT then simply use ToMultiRepository ;-)
That split has been done exactly because we didn't like that
LocalDelivery was dealing hardcoded with the useraliasingforwarding stuff.
If your problems is with *naming* then I agree, we can improve things.
If your problem is that supporting backward compatibility make things
harder, OH YES, you can't understand how much I can agree on this. I
lost MONTHS of my 2006 life in order to try to do something new for
james without breaking compatibility. I already classified that time as
*wasted* time, and I have no problem in having a new james release
dropping the backward compatibility. So if there is a good proposal
about a new design (and I repeat that IMHO this issue will touch Mailet
API) for this stuff then I'll be happy to review. I have no time now to
revamp my old proposals.
Stefano
>> VirtualUserTable-Store is not working anymore
>> ---------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: JAMES-882
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-882
>> Project: JAMES Server
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Affects Versions: 3.0, Trunk
>> Reporter: Norman Maurer
>> Assignee: Norman Maurer
>> Fix For: 3.0
>>
>> Attachments: vut-support.diff
>>
>>
>> In current trunk the VirtualUserTable-Store implementation get never called from a mailet to rewrite recipients.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org