You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/07/09 10:40:15 UTC
[jira] Commented: (SLING-1040) Too much synchronization in
QuartzScheduler?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729107#action_12729107 ]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-1040:
------------------------------------------
It looks like the QuartzScheduler is holding a lock on an Array Liste while calling into the framework. Probably the lock should be released before calling into the framework (caveat: not looking at the code, just the stacktrace)
> Too much synchronization in QuartzScheduler?
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-1040
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1040
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: Commons Scheduler 2.0.4
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: deadlock-trace.txt
>
>
> In one of my jcrinstall tests I got a deadlock when jcrinstall tried to stop the org.apache.sling.commons.scheduler bundle while it was being started by the Felix ComponentActorThread.
> I'll attach the deadlock stack trace - wondering if some of the synchronized sections in QuartzScheduler could be removed, to avoid such issues.
> That might be a jcrinstall/Felix problem as well: stopping a bundle while it is being activated doesn't sound right, but I'm not sure how to prevent this, as the ComponentActorThread actions run asynchronously.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.