You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2015/04/08 22:23:08 UTC
Naming Suggestions?
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
I believe nest is trademarked already. Is it cold in here? ;)
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> *If* we have to rename anything, I liked the name "Nest" as the
> ActiveMQ Nest broker
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> > give it?
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
*If* we have to rename anything, I liked the name "Nest" as the
ActiveMQ Nest broker
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert <cl...@gmail.com>.
I liked ng at first. But reactive made a very cool name.
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 06:03, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>> On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:
>> I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
>>
>> 1. RS stands for Research.
>> 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
>> 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
>> 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
>> (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
>>> On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
>>>> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
>>>> trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always
>>>> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
>>>> just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
>>>> dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
>>>> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>>> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
>>> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
>>> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
>>> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
>>> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
>>> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>>>
>>> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -g
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?
Regards
Krzysztof
On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:
> I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
>
> 1. RS stands for Research.
> 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
> 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
> 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
> (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
> On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> ...
>>> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
>>> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
>>> trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always
>>> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
>>> just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
>>> dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
>>> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
>> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
>> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
>> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
>> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
>> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>>
>> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Jim Gomes <e....@gmail.com>.
I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
1. RS stands for Research.
2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
(ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >...
> > That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
> > name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
> > trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always
> > be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
> > just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
> > dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
> > ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>
> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>
> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>...
> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
> trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always
> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
> just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
> dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
Cheers,
-g
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Chris,
Calm down…
*At this point* I don’t see any reason for include trademarks@ in this. Once we have some ideas to present to trademarks@, then yes. We definitely need to include them and make sure whatever we select is acceptable.
Are we supposed to just send a note that says something like:
"We are trying to come up with a code name for some development efforts we are working on. We have no idea what we’re going to call it yet as we’ve just started discussing possible names. Just letting you know!”
That seems like a waste of time for the trademarks@ folks. Once we’ve discussed things here and and decided on a name or possible sets of names we feel are suitable, then sure. We’d log an issue at PODLINGNAMESEARCH and send a note to trademarks@ and make sure it’s OK prior to making it final.
That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a name of a “Project”, it SHOULD be easier (but again, we’ll verify with trademarks@ when we’ve decided on a name). The name should always be referred to as “Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH” and never “Apache BLAH” or just “BLAH”. The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
Dan
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> See:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
>
> For a framework on what to answer about names. Realize
> as well that despite my repeatedly telling you guys you
> need to include trademarks@ in this discussion b/c you
> are bypassing the traditional way of bringing projects
> into Apache by doing the due diligence necessary for naming,
> you are *still not including trademarks@*.
>
> Please. Rectify. This.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> Reply-To: <de...@activemq.apache.org>
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM
> To: ActiveMQ-Developers <de...@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: Naming Suggestions?
>
>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>.
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
For a framework on what to answer about names. Realize
as well that despite my repeatedly telling you guys you
need to include trademarks@ in this discussion b/c you
are bypassing the traditional way of bringing projects
into Apache by doing the due diligence necessary for naming,
you are *still not including trademarks@*.
Please. Rectify. This.
Cheers,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Reply-To: <de...@activemq.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM
To: ActiveMQ-Developers <de...@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: Naming Suggestions?
>Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>give it?
>
>--
>Hiram Chirino
>Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
Shouldn't we get the best ones and start a vote already?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe ActiveMQ Octopus? -- cool logo potential, and many arms doing
> things is apropos to the design goals.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mark Frazier <mm...@me.com> wrote:
>> Seems like something Hat themed would be apropos:
>>
>> ActiveMQ Bowler
>> ActiveMQ Tophat
>> ActiveMQ Beanie
>> ActiveMQ Ascot
>> ActiveMQ Beret
>> ActiveMQ Chullo
>> ActiveMQ Sombrero
>> ActiveMQ Fez
>> ActiveMQ Mitre
>>
>>
>> The list goes on…. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hat#Hat_styles
>>
>>> On Apr 10, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
>>> <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
>>>> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
>>>> hipster ring to it too ;)
>>>>
>>>> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>>> give it?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> James
>>>> -------
>>>> Red Hat
>>>>
>>>> Twitter: @jstrachan
>>>> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
>>>> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
>>>> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Integration
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Maybe ActiveMQ Octopus? -- cool logo potential, and many arms doing
things is apropos to the design goals.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mark Frazier <mm...@me.com> wrote:
> Seems like something Hat themed would be apropos:
>
> ActiveMQ Bowler
> ActiveMQ Tophat
> ActiveMQ Beanie
> ActiveMQ Ascot
> ActiveMQ Beret
> ActiveMQ Chullo
> ActiveMQ Sombrero
> ActiveMQ Fez
> ActiveMQ Mitre
>
>
> The list goes on…. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hat#Hat_styles
>
>> On Apr 10, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
>> <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
>>> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
>>> hipster ring to it too ;)
>>>
>>> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>> give it?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> James
>>> -------
>>> Red Hat
>>>
>>> Twitter: @jstrachan
>>> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
>>> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
>>> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>>>
>>> Open Source Integration
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Mark Frazier <mm...@me.com>.
Seems like something Hat themed would be apropos:
ActiveMQ Bowler
ActiveMQ Tophat
ActiveMQ Beanie
ActiveMQ Ascot
ActiveMQ Beret
ActiveMQ Chullo
ActiveMQ Sombrero
ActiveMQ Fez
ActiveMQ Mitre
The list goes on…. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hat#Hat_styles
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
> <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
>> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
>> hipster ring to it too ;)
>>
>> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> Red Hat
>>
>> Twitter: @jstrachan
>> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
>> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
>> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
+1
On 10/04/15 15:55, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
> <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
>> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
>> hipster ring to it too ;)
>>
>> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> Red Hat
>>
>> Twitter: @jstrachan
>> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
>> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
>> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
+1
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
<ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
> hipster ring to it too ;)
>
> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
>
> Twitter: @jstrachan
> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>
> Open Source Integration
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
hipster ring to it too ;)
On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
--
James
-------
Red Hat
Twitter: @jstrachan
Email: jstracha@redhat.com
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
Open Source Integration
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Apache <name> incubating has a very nice ring to it
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
+1
Bruce
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
wrote:
> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> >> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> >> > give it?
> >>
> >> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>
> >> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Hiram Chirino
> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >> > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Battlestar. Basestar. There are probably more A's and C's that I can
think of right now than B's.
Steering clear of the Cylon models.. :)
Robbie
On 10 April 2015 at 17:51, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Yes a BSG fan! Baltar would work
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Andy Taylor <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Or Baltar ;)
>> On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>> > Bertha, I like that. If we are using an alphabetic progression, then
>> that
>> > could come after Apollo. :)
>> >
>> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>> > > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
>> means
>> > > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>> > >
>> > > I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
>> > > "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>> > day.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>> > >
>> > > I like that! REActiveMQ
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>> > visual
>> > > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > --
>> > > > Dejan Bosanac
>> > > > ----------------------
>> > > > Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > Twitter: @dejanb
>> > > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > > > clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>> > > > > <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>> > james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> How about Starbuck?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>> > <javascript:;>');>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and
>> pronounce
>> > > > would
>> > > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
>> > > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus"
>> project.
>> > > I'd
>> > > > > >>> prefer
>> > > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>> > Artemis
>> > > > is
>> > > > > >>> pushing
>> > > > > >>> > it a little for me.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>> > > goddess.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for
>> code
>> > > > > names?
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>> > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>> > > > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>> > dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>> > > > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code
>> grant
>> > a
>> > > > code
>> > > > > >>> name
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>> > avoid
>> > > > lots
>> > > > > >>> of TM
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>> > good
>> > > > > name
>> > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>> > > fusesource.com |
>> > > > > redhat.com
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> -
>> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
>> > > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
>> > > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
>> > > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>> > > fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> > > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Clebert Suconic
>> > > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> > > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *Christian Posta*
>> > > twitter: @christianposta
>> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > > http://fabric8.io
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Mark Frazier <mm...@me.com>.
If you want a BSG theme, what about “Number 6”.
Too racy?
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 9:51 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Yes a BSG fan! Baltar would work
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Andy Taylor <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Or Baltar ;)
>> On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bertha, I like that. If we are using an alphabetic progression, then
>> that
>>> could come after Apollo. :)
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>>>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
>> means
>>>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>>>
>>>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
>>>> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>>> day.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>>> visual
>>>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>>> clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>>>> <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>>> james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>>> <javascript:;>');>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and
>> pronounce
>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus"
>> project.
>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>>> Artemis
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>>>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for
>> code
>>>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code
>> grant
>>> a
>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>>> avoid
>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>>> good
>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>>>> fusesource.com |
>>>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> -
>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>>>> fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Yes a BSG fan! Baltar would work
On Friday, April 10, 2015, Andy Taylor <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or Baltar ;)
> On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Bertha, I like that. If we are using an alphabetic progression, then
> that
> > could come after Apollo. :)
> >
> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> > > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
> means
> > > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
> > >
> > > I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> > > "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
> > day.
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> > >
> > > I like that! REActiveMQ
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
> > visual
> > > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > --
> > > > Dejan Bosanac
> > > > ----------------------
> > > > Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > Twitter: @dejanb
> > > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > > clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > > > <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
> > james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>');>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and
> pronounce
> > > > would
> > > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus"
> project.
> > > I'd
> > > > > >>> prefer
> > > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
> > Artemis
> > > > is
> > > > > >>> pushing
> > > > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> > > goddess.
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for
> code
> > > > > names?
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
> > dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code
> grant
> > a
> > > > code
> > > > > >>> name
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
> > avoid
> > > > lots
> > > > > >>> of TM
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
> > good
> > > > > name
> > > > > >>> to
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> |
> > > fusesource.com |
> > > > > redhat.com
> > > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> -
> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>>> --
> > > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> --
> > > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> |
> > > fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Christian Posta*
> > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > http://fabric8.io
> > >
> >
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Andy Taylor <an...@gmail.com>.
Or Baltar ;)
On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Bertha, I like that. If we are using an alphabetic progression, then that
> could come after Apollo. :)
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
> >
> > I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> > "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
> day.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> >
> > I like that! REActiveMQ
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
> visual
> > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > --
> > > Dejan Bosanac
> > > ----------------------
> > > Red Hat, Inc.
> > > dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;>
> > > Twitter: @dejanb
> > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > > <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
> james@carmanconsulting.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>');>>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > > would
> > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> > I'd
> > > > >>> prefer
> > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
> Artemis
> > > is
> > > > >>> pushing
> > > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> > goddess.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > > names?
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
> dkulp@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant
> a
> > > code
> > > > >>> name
> > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
> avoid
> > > lots
> > > > >>> of TM
> > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
> good
> > > > name
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> > fusesource.com |
> > > > redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
> > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> --
> > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> > fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
> >
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Bertha, I like that. If we are using an alphabetic progression, then that
could come after Apollo. :)
On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>
> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like that! REActiveMQ
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;>
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com <javascript:;>');>>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > would
> > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> I'd
> > > >>> prefer
> > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> > is
> > > >>> pushing
> > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> goddess.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > names?
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> > code
> > > >>> name
> > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> > lots
> > > >>> of TM
> > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > > name
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com |
> > > redhat.com
> > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> --
> > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
Message processing is done by one thread driven event loop- like node.js. Though in reality, it would be multi reactor - with multiple event loops - maybe one per core. Apollo,HornetQ, vert.x are examples of this using this pattern
> On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:42, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> That's not a definition of "reactive." It's just an example of its use. What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
> kernel"
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>
>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
>> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>
>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>> would
>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>> I'd
>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
>>> is
>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>> hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
>>> code
>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
>>> lots
>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
>>>> name
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by dlalaina <dl...@gmail.com>.
I like easy names too:
ActiveMQ Led
ActiveMQ Pulse
ActiveMQ Nova
ActiveMQ Dwarf
ActiveMQ Luna
ActiveMQ Puma
ActiveMQ Eagle
ActiveMQ Gorilla
ActiveMQ Fox
ActiveMQ Anna
ActiveMQ Guarani
ActiveMQ Avant
[]'s
Daniel La Laina
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 6:15 PM, David Jencks [via ActiveMQ] <
ml-node+s2283324n4694738h46@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Interesting…. long ago I read a book written by some IBM guy circa 1980
> that basically proposed this architecture using batch jobs on a mainframe,
> with the same load characteristics and advantages… and arguments. Maybe it
> will get farther this time.
>
> Also, I'm fine with activemq-reactive for a name. Don't mind artemis or
> luna either.
>
> david jencks
>
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 3:00 PM, James Strachan <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=0>> wrote:
>
> > For background on the reactive movement - which is often
> > netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
> > http://www.reactivemanifesto.org
> >
> > It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve
> mechanical
> > sympathy & high performance
> >
> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=1>> wrote:
> >
> >> That's not a definition of "reactive." It's just an example of its
> use.
> >> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
> >>
> >>
> >> Justin
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=2> <javascript:;>>
> >> To: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=3> <javascript:;>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> >>
> >> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty
> broker
> >> kernel"
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=4>
> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> >>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
> means
> >>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
> >>>
> >>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> >>> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
> >> day.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Justin
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=5> <javascript:;>>
> >>> To: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=6> <javascript:;>
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> >>>
> >>> I like that! REActiveMQ
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=7>
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
> >> visual
> >>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dejan Bosanac
> >>>> ----------------------
> >>>> Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=8> <javascript:;>
> >>>> Twitter: @dejanb
> >>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> >>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=9> <javascript:;>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> >>>>> <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=10> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
> >> [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=11>
> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=12>
> >> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=13>
> <javascript:;>');>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> >>>> would
> >>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
> >>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=14>
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> >>> I'd
> >>>>>>>> prefer
> >>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
> >> Artemis
> >>>> is
> >>>>>>>> pushing
> >>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> >>> goddess.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> >>>>> names?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> >>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=15> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=16> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
> >> [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=17>
> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=18> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant
> >> a
> >>>> code
> >>>>>>>> name
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
> >> avoid
> >>>> lots
> >>>>>>>> of TM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
> >> good
> >>>>> name
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=19> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> |
> >> fusesource.com |
> >>>>> redhat.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=20> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> -
> >> http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
> >>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=21> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> |
> >> fusesource.com |
> >>> redhat.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Clebert Suconic
> >>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
> <ht...@jboss.com>
> >>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Christian Posta*
> >>> twitter: @christianposta
> >>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >>> http://fabric8.io
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> http://fabric8.io
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > James
> > -------
> > Red Hat
> >
> > Twitter: @jstrachan
> > Email: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4694738&i=22>
> > Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> >
> > hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> > fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
> >
> > Open Source Integration
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Naming-Suggestions-tp4694553p4694738.html
> To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - Dev, email
> ml-node+s2283324n2368404h92@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - Dev, click here
> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2368404&code=ZGxhbGFpbmFAZ21haWwuY29tfDIzNjg0MDR8MTUwNDg1ODE0MQ==>
> .
> NAML
> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Naming-Suggestions-tp4694553p4694778.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Interesting…. long ago I read a book written by some IBM guy circa 1980 that basically proposed this architecture using batch jobs on a mainframe, with the same load characteristics and advantages… and arguments. Maybe it will get farther this time.
Also, I'm fine with activemq-reactive for a name. Don't mind artemis or luna either.
david jencks
On Apr 10, 2015, at 3:00 PM, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For background on the reactive movement - which is often
> netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
> http://www.reactivemanifesto.org
>
> It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve mechanical
> sympathy & high performance
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
>
>> That's not a definition of "reactive." It's just an example of its use.
>> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>
>> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
>> kernel"
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>>
>>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
>>> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>> day.
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>>
>>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>> visual
>>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;>
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>> clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>>> <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>> james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com <javascript:;>');>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>>> I'd
>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>> Artemis
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant
>> a
>>>> code
>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>> avoid
>>>> lots
>>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>> good
>>>>> name
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
>>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
>
> Twitter: @jstrachan
> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>
> Open Source Integration
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
For background on the reactive movement - which is often
netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
http://www.reactivemanifesto.org
It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve mechanical
sympathy & high performance
On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
> That's not a definition of "reactive." It's just an example of its use.
> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
> kernel"
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
> >
> > I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> > "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the
> day.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > To: dev@activemq.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> >
> > I like that! REActiveMQ
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
> visual
> > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > --
> > > Dejan Bosanac
> > > ----------------------
> > > Red Hat, Inc.
> > > dbosanac@redhat.com <javascript:;>
> > > Twitter: @dejanb
> > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > clebert.suconic@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > > <james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
> james@carmanconsulting.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com <javascript:;>');>>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > > would
> > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> > I'd
> > > > >>> prefer
> > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
> Artemis
> > > is
> > > > >>> pushing
> > > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> > goddess.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > > names?
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > > hiram@hiramchirino.com <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant
> a
> > > code
> > > > >>> name
> > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
> avoid
> > > lots
> > > > >>> of TM
> > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
> good
> > > > name
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com |
> > > > redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> --
> > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com |
> > redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>
--
James
-------
Red Hat
Twitter: @jstrachan
Email: jstracha@redhat.com
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
Open Source Integration
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com>.
That's not a definition of "reactive." It's just an example of its use. What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
kernel"
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>
> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like that! REActiveMQ
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > dbosanac@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > would
> > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> I'd
> > > >>> prefer
> > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> > is
> > > >>> pushing
> > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> goddess.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > names?
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> > code
> > > >>> name
> > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> > lots
> > > >>> of TM
> > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > > name
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > > redhat.com
> > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> --
> > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>
--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
kernel"
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com> wrote:
> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>
> I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it
> "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like that! REActiveMQ
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > dbosanac@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > would
> > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> I'd
> > > >>> prefer
> > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> > is
> > > >>> pushing
> > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> goddess.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > names?
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> > code
> > > >>> name
> > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> > lots
> > > >>> of TM
> > > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > > name
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > > redhat.com
> > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> --
> > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>
--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.com>.
Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
I don't particularly care what it's code-named. You could call it "Bertha" if you like. I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Posta" <ch...@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
I like that! REActiveMQ
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > >
> > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> How about Starbuck?
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> would
> > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
> > >>> prefer
> > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> is
> > >>> pushing
> > >>> > it a little for me.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > names?
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> code
> > >>> name
> > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> lots
> > >>> of TM
> > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > name
> > >>> to
> > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> --
> > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > redhat.com
> > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> --
> > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> --
> > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> --
> > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> >
>
--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:56 AM, James Green <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ActiveMQ Art: most people would expect you to be referring to the graphics
> within.
>
Well, People would get it with the proper announcements...it's all
about the brand... Like people would think about the fruit when Apple
started.
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Green <ja...@gmail.com>.
ActiveMQ Art: most people would expect you to be referring to the graphics
within.
On 10 April 2015 at 14:47, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I like Luna.
>
> Although if you abbreviate Artemis you get Art.. which is another
> meaningful and very short word.
>
>
> would Art be a good name?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
> > be my preference too :-)
> > Luna hits the mark.
> >
> > On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
> prefer
> >> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
> pushing
> >> it a little for me.
> >>
> >> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> >>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >>>>
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
> name
> >>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
> of TM
> >>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name
> to
> >>>>>>> give it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> *Christian Posta*
> >>>>> twitter: @christianposta
> >>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >>>>> http://fabric8.io
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I like Luna.
Although if you abbreviate Artemis you get Art.. which is another
meaningful and very short word.
would Art be a good name?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
> be my preference too :-)
> Luna hits the mark.
>
> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd prefer
>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is pushing
>> it a little for me.
>>
>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>>>
>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>>>
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>>
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>
>>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On 04/10/2015 11:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
+1
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
>>>>> prefer
>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
>>>>> pushing
>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>> names?
>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>> hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
>> name
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.bish@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
I like that! REActiveMQ
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > >
> > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> How about Starbuck?
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> would
> > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
> > >>> prefer
> > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> is
> > >>> pushing
> > >>> > it a little for me.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > names?
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> code
> > >>> name
> > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> lots
> > >>> of TM
> > >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > name
> > >>> to
> > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> --
> > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > redhat.com
> > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> --
> > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> --
> > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> --
> > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> >
>
--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> >
> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> How about Starbuck?
> >>
> >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
> >>> be my preference too :-)
> >>> Luna hits the mark.
> >>>
> >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
> >>> prefer
> >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
> >>> pushing
> >>> > it a little for me.
> >>> >
> >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> names?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> >>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
> >>> name
> >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
> >>> of TM
> >>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> name
> >>> to
> >>> >>>>>> give it?
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Dan
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> --
> >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> --
> >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> --
> >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>> >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I am.. but I thought about the coffee :)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>> How about Starbuck?
>>
>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
>>> be my preference too :-)
>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>
>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
>>> prefer
>>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
>>> pushing
>>> > it a little for me.
>>> >
>>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
>>> name
>>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
>>> of TM
>>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name
>>> to
>>> >>>>>> give it?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Dan
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> --
>>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Hiram Chirino
>>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
No Battlestar Galactica fans?
On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> How about Starbuck?
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
>> be my preference too :-)
>> Luna hits the mark.
>>
>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
>> prefer
>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
>> pushing
>> > it a little for me.
>> >
>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>> >>
>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>> >>>
>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
>> name
>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
>> of TM
>> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name
>> to
>> >>>>>> give it?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dan
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
>> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Hiram Chirino
>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
How about Starbuck?
On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
> be my preference too :-)
> Luna hits the mark.
>
> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
> prefer
> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is
> pushing
> > it a little for me.
> >
> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
> >
> >
> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> >>
> >> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
> >>
> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> >>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >>>
> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> <javascript:;>
> >>>
> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
> name
> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of
> TM
> >>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> >>>>>> give it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> | fusesource.com
> | redhat.com
> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Hiram Chirino
> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>
> >
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce would
be my preference too :-)
Luna hits the mark.
On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd prefer
> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis is pushing
> it a little for me.
>
> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
>
>
> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>
>> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>>
>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>>
>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project. I'd
prefer to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
is pushing it a little for me.
How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon goddess.
On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>>> give it?
>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>
>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> http://fabric8.io
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
Nope.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:18:28AM -0400, James Carman wrote:
> It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
>
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> > I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> > >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> > >> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> > >> > give it?
> > >>
> > >> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > >>
> > >> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Hiram Chirino
> > >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >> > hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daniel Kulp
> > >> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Christian Posta*
> > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > http://fabric8.io
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> >> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> >> > give it?
> >>
> >> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>
> >> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Hiram Chirino
> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >> > hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> > give it?
>>
>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>
>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Hiram Chirino
>> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> > give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
So I'm about to start a vote thread to pick from the name option
posted on this thread. I'm only going to include options posted on
this thread that have received a +1 from someone else to help reduce
the options a bit. If you like an option that was posted, but have
not seen anyone else +1 it, please +1 it soon :)
Right now the only ones with +1 are:
ActiveMQ Artemis
ActiveMQ Luna
ActiveMQ Reactive
Regards,
HIram
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 for Artemis
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 10:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
>>
>>
>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>
>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 for Artemis
Regards
JB
On 04/08/2015 10:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Petter Nordlander <Pe...@enfo.se>.
Hermes JMS (http://www.hermesjms.com<http://www.hermesjms.com/>) is a product in the same area. Although it’s a dead project, it still widely used as it’s bundled with the popular Soap UI product. A name collision could lead to confusion.
Just a thought.
Petter
Från: Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>>
Svara till: "dev@activemq.apache.org<ma...@activemq.apache.org>" <de...@activemq.apache.org>>
Datum: onsdag 8 april 2015 22:42
Till: "dev@activemq.apache.org<ma...@activemq.apache.org>" <de...@activemq.apache.org>>
Ämne: Re: Naming Suggestions?
+1 Hermes
[cid:part1.05010901.07050308@gmail.com]
Daniel Kulp<ma...@apache.org>
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
Dan
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com<ma...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
[cid:part2.01060801.04000409@gmail.com]
Hiram Chirino<ma...@hiramchirino.com>
8 April 2015 21:23
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hermes is already taken by Hermes JMS.. I wouldn't want to clash with that
name: http://www.hermesjms.com/confluence/display/HJMS/Home
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Hermes
>
> Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
> 8 April 2015 21:41
>
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> 8 April 2015 21:23
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
Good point
+1 Artemis
> On 8 Apr 2015, at 21:52, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html
>
>> On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 Hermes
>>
>>> Daniel Kulp 8 April 2015 21:41
>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>>>> give it?
>>>> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>
>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>>> Hiram Chirino 8 April 2015 21:23
>>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Hermes
>
> Daniel Kulp <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dkulp@apache.org');>
> 8 April 2015 21:41
>
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hiram@hiramchirino.com');> wrote:
>
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hchirino@redhat.com');> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> Hiram Chirino <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hiram@hiramchirino.com');>
> 8 April 2015 21:23
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Daniel Guggi <da...@gmail.com>.
i'm still fine with amq-6 :)
but if it has to be changed, my vote is of course "hades" :P
what ever name - lets get going!
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Hermes
>
> Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
> 8 April 2015 21:41
>
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> 8 April 2015 21:23
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 Hermes
> Daniel Kulp <ma...@apache.org>
> 8 April 2015 21:41
>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino<hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>
> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> Hiram Chirino <ma...@hiramchirino.com>
> 8 April 2015 21:23
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
>
Re: Naming Suggestions?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> give it?
Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother.
Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
Dan
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com