You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@apache.org> on 2008/08/21 14:13:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
The SVN tag for the release is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
+1 to release from me.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Looks good to me, +1.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks to everyone for your time on TUSCANY-2531, given the fact this
> is an axis bug then I concur and will switch my vote to +1 :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:22 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved
>>>> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability
>>>> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it
>>>> can be executed on java 1.4 clients.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dave.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>>>> <c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > +1
>>>> >
>>>> > ++Vamsi
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are
>>>> >> now
>>>> >> available, please review and vote to release.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The artifacts are available for at:
>>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven
>>>> >> staging
>>>> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
>>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +1 to release from me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ...ant
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>
>>> I looks like Simon has run
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent
>>> it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but
>>> that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an
>>> actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around
>>> which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace
>>> to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being?
>>>
>>> As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e)
>>> can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like
>>> either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some
>>> time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have
>>> been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the
>>> Geronimo fix.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>
>> If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we
>> should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note
>> for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other
>> PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guys,
Thanks to everyone for your time on TUSCANY-2531, given the fact this
is an axis bug then I concur and will switch my vote to +1 :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:22 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved
>>> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability
>>> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it
>>> can be executed on java 1.4 clients.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>>> <c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > ++Vamsi
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are
>>> >> now
>>> >> available, please review and vote to release.
>>> >>
>>> >> The artifacts are available for at:
>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
>>> >>
>>> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven
>>> >> staging
>>> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>>> >>
>>> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 to release from me.
>>> >>
>>> >> ...ant
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>> I looks like Simon has run
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent
>> it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but
>> that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an
>> actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around
>> which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace
>> to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being?
>>
>> As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e)
>> can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like
>> either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some
>> time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have
>> been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the
>> Geronimo fix.
>>
>> Simon
>
> If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we
> should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note
> for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other
> PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply?
>
> ...ant
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved
>> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability
>> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it
>> can be executed on java 1.4 clients.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>> <c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > ++Vamsi
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are
>> now
>> >> available, please review and vote to release.
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts are available for at:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
>> >>
>> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
>> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>> >>
>> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>> >>
>> >> +1 to release from me.
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> I looks like Simon has run
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent
> it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but
> that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an
> actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around
> which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace
> to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being?
>
> As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e)
> can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like
> either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some
> time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have
> been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the
> Geronimo fix.
>
> Simon
>
If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we
should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note
for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other
PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply?
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved
> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability
> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it
> can be executed on java 1.4 clients.
>
> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> <c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > ++Vamsi
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
> >> available, please review and vote to release.
> >>
> >> The artifacts are available for at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
> >>
> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
> >>
> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
> >>
> >> +1 to release from me.
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >
> >
>
I looks like Simon has run
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent
it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but
that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an
actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around
which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace
to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being?
As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e) can
someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like
either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some
time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have
been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the
Geronimo fix.
Simon
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys,
I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved
the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability
for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it
can be executed on java 1.4 clients.
Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
>> available, please review and vote to release.
>>
>> The artifacts are available for at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
>>
>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
>> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>>
>> The SVN tag for the release is:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>>
>> +1 to release from me.
>>
>> ...ant
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
+1
++Vamsi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
> available, please review and vote to release.
>
> The artifacts are available for at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
>
> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>
> +1 to release from me.
>
> ...ant
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ant, for clarifying the same.
+1 to release 1.3.1 RC1
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:00 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The artifacts got downloaded and unpacked sucessfully. Ran few samples and
>> demos, works for me.
>>
>> I would like to clarify about the number of samples available in the
>> binary distribution and the source distribution. The source distribution
>> seems to have more samples than the binary distribution. Looks like the same
>> is the case with previous release 1.3RC3.
>>
>> The binary distribution does not contain the following samples:
>> loanapplication
>> calculator-ws-secure-webapp
>> helloworld-jms-webapp
>>
>> Any reason, why we have it this way?
>>
>>
> Its been that way over all the Tuscany releases i think, samples only get
> added to the binary distribution when someone decides they should be
> included and the get excluded sometime if the doc doesn't look ready. Like
> you say, it was like this in previous releases so i don't think it should be
> a problem for this 1.3.1 release.
>
> ...ant
>
>
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The artifacts got downloaded and unpacked sucessfully. Ran few samples and
> demos, works for me.
>
> I would like to clarify about the number of samples available in the binary
> distribution and the source distribution. The source distribution seems to
> have more samples than the binary distribution. Looks like the same is the
> case with previous release 1.3RC3.
>
> The binary distribution does not contain the following samples:
> loanapplication
> calculator-ws-secure-webapp
> helloworld-jms-webapp
>
> Any reason, why we have it this way?
>
>
Its been that way over all the Tuscany releases i think, samples only get
added to the binary distribution when someone decides they should be
included and the get excluded sometime if the doc doesn't look ready. Like
you say, it was like this in previous releases so i don't think it should be
a problem for this 1.3.1 release.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
The artifacts got downloaded and unpacked sucessfully. Ran few samples and
demos, works for me.
I would like to clarify about the number of samples available in the binary
distribution and the source distribution. The source distribution seems to
have more samples than the binary distribution. Looks like the same is the
case with previous release 1.3RC3.
The binary distribution does not contain the following samples:
loanapplication
calculator-ws-secure-webapp
helloworld-jms-webapp
Any reason, why we have it this way?
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Tried various samples and demos. Downloaded and ran the plugin on a few
>> projects. Works for me.
>>
>>
>> ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
>>> available, please review and vote to release.
>>>
>>> The artifacts are available for at:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
>>>
>>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
>>> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>>>
>>> The SVN tag for the release is:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>>>
>>> +1 to release from me.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks, Dan Becker
>>
>
> Ran through a small number of samples/demos and tried the problematic
> webapps on tomcat and websphere. All looks ok. Built Dave's EJB sample
> against the RC1 maven artifacts. Also looks ok. RAT looks ok.
>
> +1 to release 1.3.1 RC1
>
> Simon
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Tried various samples and demos. Downloaded and ran the plugin on a few
> projects. Works for me.
>
>
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
>> available, please review and vote to release.
>>
>> The artifacts are available for at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
>>
>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
>> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>>
>> The SVN tag for the release is:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>>
>> +1 to release from me.
>>
>
> --
> Thanks, Dan Becker
>
Ran through a small number of samples/demos and tried the problematic
webapps on tomcat and websphere. All looks ok. Built Dave's EJB sample
against the RC1 maven artifacts. Also looks ok. RAT looks ok.
+1 to release 1.3.1 RC1
Simon
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
Tried various samples and demos. Downloaded and ran the plugin on a few
projects. Works for me.
ant elder wrote:
> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
> available, please review and vote to release.
>
> The artifacts are available for at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
>
> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>
> +1 to release from me.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1)
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
Passed with seven +1s from: me, Dan Becker, Simon Laws, Ramkumar R,
Vamsavardhana Reddy, Dave Sowerby, Luciano Resende.
...ant
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:13 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
> available, please review and vote to release.
>
> The artifacts are available for at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/>
>
> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1
>
> +1 to release from me.
>
> ...ant
>