You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Sailaja Mada <sa...@citrix.com> on 2013/04/19 13:38:32 UTC

[ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Hi,

CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan :  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CISCO+ASA+Firewall+Test+Plan


Please review the test plan and provide the inputs.



Jira ID: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
FS: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cisco+VNMC+integration

Thanks,
Sailaja.M

RE: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Posted by Sailaja Mada <sa...@citrix.com>.
Hi Koushik,

Test plan has the category's as listed below already.  Please refer to the first column. I will tag them positive and negative .

Category - Testcases Category :


*         ASA

*         VNMC

*         Network Offering

*         Guest Network -Operations

*         Firewall/Portforwarding- Incoming

*         Firewall/StaticNat- Incoming

*         Rules - Firewall  - Outgoing

*         Upgrade

*         Public IP

*         VM Operations

*         VR

*         Multiple Clusters

*         Mixed Cluster

*         Reachability

As there are close to 100 testcases , I have not added them in the wiki directly.

Thanks,
Sailaja.M

From: Koushik Das
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:50 PM
To: Sailaja Mada; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Thanks Sailaja for sharing the test cases. I see that there is a long list of test cases. It will help if you can categorize them like


-          VNMC lifecycle

-          ASA lifecycle

-          Network offering

-          Network lifecycle

-          Source nat

-          Static nat

-          Pf

-          Firewall rules

-          Etc...

Also for each category classify them as positive and negative scenarios. That will provide better readability. Also if possible put the contents in the wiki directly rather than attaching as .xls

-Koushik

From: Sailaja Mada
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 5:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Koushik Das; Sailaja Mada
Subject: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Hi,

CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan :  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CISCO+ASA+Firewall+Test+Plan


Please review the test plan and provide the inputs.



Jira ID: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
FS: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cisco+VNMC+integration

Thanks,
Sailaja.M

RE: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Posted by Koushik Das <ko...@citrix.com>.
Thanks Sailaja for sharing the test cases. I see that there is a long list of test cases. It will help if you can categorize them like


-          VNMC lifecycle

-          ASA lifecycle

-          Network offering

-          Network lifecycle

-          Source nat

-          Static nat

-          Pf

-          Firewall rules

-          Etc...

Also for each category classify them as positive and negative scenarios. That will provide better readability. Also if possible put the contents in the wiki directly rather than attaching as .xls

-Koushik

From: Sailaja Mada
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 5:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Koushik Das; Sailaja Mada
Subject: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Hi,

CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan :  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CISCO+ASA+Firewall+Test+Plan


Please review the test plan and provide the inputs.



Jira ID: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
FS: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cisco+VNMC+integration

Thanks,
Sailaja.M