Re: Bye for good FuzzyOCR - SVN Performance

[James MacLean <ma...@ednet.ns.ca>]

Steve West wrote, on 26/07/07 10:59 AM:
> decoder wrote:
>> Try using the SVN Version (revision 132). This is basically the same
>> as the latest 3.5.x release but some issues with SA 3.2.x were fixed.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Chris
>
> We are running SA 3.2.1 and just wondering if anyone using the SVN 
> version on a production server processing 10,000 to 15,000 emails per 
> day? Specifically, I would be interested in hearing if the SVN is 
> stable enough to be used in a production environment and what type of 
> load gets added.
>
> thx,
>
> SW
>
Just upgraded to 3.2.2. Running FuzzyOCR SVN. Looking ok thus far. We 
use to have (many revisions ago :)) spamd climb high in CPU and also 
children taking too long to complete, but this has not been noticed to 
date.

It is not _our_ busy time of the year but :

  TOTAL               Volume   Messages Addresses     Hosts      
Delayed       Failed
  Received            1306MB      41693               14264       8  
0.0%    546  1.3%
  Delivered           1306MB      41149     48547        25
  Rejects                        109324               35410
  Temp Rejects                      106                   5

We reject at connect (500 errors) so the Reject line would be SPAM / 
Block list totals.

JES