You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Scott Ahten <pi...@pixelfreak.net> on 2001/10/10 05:32:36 UTC
Re: new to tomcat - mod_webapp vs. mod_jk
Greg,
i'm running in stand-alone mode for the moment due to the lack of a
binary version of mod_webapp for win32...
if i manage to find a pre-compiled version and get things working with
tomcat 4 / mod_webapp.. i'll be sure to post to the list...
~scott
Greg Chakmamkian wrote:
> Hi Scott. One quick question. You said you have Tomcat 4 running
> well on win2k. Are you using mod_jk or mod_webapp. I was using
> Tomcat 3.2.2 for a while and decided to upgrade to Tomcat 4. All of
> the documentation I found for Tomcat 4 pointed to using mod_webapp for
> its Apache connector. Just curious what you used. thanks.
>
> -greg
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 9, 2001, at 01:50 AM, Scott Ahten wrote:
>
>> based on the questions being asked, i think the many of the people
>> who are looking for binaries or are unsure which module to use with
>> apache are individuals who have never used tomcat before version 4.0
>> final and are new to open source projects [such as myself.]
>>
>> since i've never used jserv or any of the earlier versions of tomcat,
>> i'm unfamilar with mod_jk and all of the other issues surrounding
>> it's use. if i want to make an informed decission on which module to
>> use, i need to look though *all* of the exsiting documentation [of
>> which, a large % is specific to older versions of jserv and tomcat]
>> and figure out which parts apply to tomcat 4.0.
>> this leaves me two options: make a large investment reading
>> documentation, of which only a small amount is actualy related to
>> tomcat 4 or post questions to fill in the gaps on how to use mod_webapp.
>> please keep this in mind when questions such as these are posted to
>> the list.
>>
>> from my limited experience, i've found with tomcat 4.0 final on
>> windows 2k to be very stable and a great product... keep up the good
>> work!
>>
>> ~scott
>>
>
>
>
>