oops RE: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed...

[Robert Greene <rg...@versant.com>]

I believe I've miss spoke.

There has been a lot of work done on the site, great job Andy.

At first I thought it was a cut and paste of material, when reading the "Why
JDO" page.  Quite possible that's the only spot that needs updating.

Cheers,
-Robert

Robert Charles Greene
V.P. Product Strategy
Versant Corporation
255 Shoreline Dr  #450
Redwood City, CA 94065
Office:  (650)232-2431
Cell: (925)577-4634


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Greene [mailto:rgreene@versant.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:36 AM
To: Michelle.Caisse@sun.com; jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Cc: JDO Expert Group
Subject: RE: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed...


BTW - It's probably just a matter of rearranging and/or eliminating a few
things.  For example, there is a lot of good content on JPA, there is just
also a lot of out dated stuff.

Robert Charles Greene
V.P. Product Strategy
Versant Corporation
255 Shoreline Dr  #450
Redwood City, CA 94065
Office:  (650)232-2431
Cell: (925)577-4634


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Greene [mailto:rgreene@versant.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:33 AM
To: Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM; jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Cc: JDO Expert Group
Subject: RE: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed...


I think if we're going to put a story on the serverside, we ought to revisit
some of the content of the site.  For example, "Why JDO" still refers to
J2EE Entity Beans, Toplink, Hibernate, etc.  Perhaps it is time to update to
address JPA and put a statement in place about how JDO fits in with how
alternatives have evolved over the last 3 years.

Cheers,
-Robert

Robert Charles Greene
V.P. Product Strategy
Versant Corporation
255 Shoreline Dr  #450
Redwood City, CA 94065
Office:  (650)232-2431
Cell: (925)577-4634


-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 8:49 AM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Cc: JDO Expert Group
Subject: Re: JDO 2.1 specification draft can be reviewed...


It would be nice if we could get the jdocentral.com redirect to
http://db.apache.org/jdo/jdocentral in place first. Does anyone have any
influence to get this to happen?

-- Michelle

Joerg von Frantzius wrote:

>Hi Craig,
>
>I think that's worth some "Apache JDO site relaunched" story on
>serverside, isn't it?
>The site is really much better now, and one can quickly see what it's
>all about (whereas before that was only understandable for spec addicts,
>and that only after due studying the site).
>
>Regards,
>Jörg
>
>Craig L Russell schrieb:
>
>
>>Hi Joerg,
>>
>>Andy Jefferson has put in a ton of work to upgrade the site.
>>
>>Craig
>>
>>On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Joerg von Frantzius wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Wow! Is that really the site I used to know as apache's jdo site?!
>>>
>>>Andy Jefferson schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 19 October  2007, David Ezzio (ys) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://db.apache.org/jdo/documentation.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>http://db.apache.org/jdo/specifications.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>Craig Russell
>>Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>>408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>