You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> on 2009/01/03 07:39:07 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 01/03/2009 07:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Your votes please;
>
> ±1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
>
>
> Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009.
-1. It crashes on start for me:
#0 0xb7e67140 in apr_table_get (t=0x0, key=0x80a6d40 "http") at tables/apr_tables.c:475
#1 0x0808042f in ap_apply_accept_filter (p=0x80a50a0, lis=<value optimized out>, server=0x82f9bf8) at listen.c:190
#2 0x08080c13 in ap_setup_listeners (s=0x80acb00) at listen.c:569
#3 0x0808bf2a in worker_open_logs (p=0x80a70a8, plog=0x80d51f0, ptemp=0x80d71f8, s=0x80acb00) at worker.c:1888
#4 0x08078630 in ap_run_open_logs (pconf=0x80a70a8, plog=0x80d51f0, ptemp=0x80d71f8, s=0x80acb00) at config.c:152
#5 0x08064b0d in main (argc=134893728, argv=0x837ae20) at main.c:709
This is fixed in r730949.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
> [ -1 ] Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha
For me, r730882 busts the build on Mac OS X. (It can't find pcre.)
More in my reply to the commit msg... -- justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Paul Querna wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Your votes please;
>
> ±1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
^^^^ This should actually be "Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha", but I
fail at editing copied text.
I hope everyone will still vote :)
Thanks,
Paul
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 01/18/2009 05:23 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>>
>>> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>>>
>>> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>>>
>>> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
>>> starting 2.3.2 early next week?
>>>
>> +1
>
> Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC
> Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled
> backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is
> still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of
> non-SNI clients.
I guess this needs to be sorted out during our alpha releases phase and
definitely be solved before releasing 2.4 GA. I currently don't worry
about it for alpha releases.
Maybe a good topic for the Hackathon at AC EU if Joe is there :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC
> Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled
> backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is
> still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of
> non-SNI clients.
This is what an alpha exists for.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>>
>> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>>
>> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
>> starting 2.3.2 early next week?
>>
>
> +1
Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC
Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled
backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is
still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of
non-SNI clients.
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>
> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>
> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk.
> Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week?
>
+1
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Paul Querna wrote:
> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>
> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>
> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
> starting 2.3.2 early next week?
+1 :)
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 01/08/2009 08:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 08.01.2009 19:33, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>>
>> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>>
>> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
>> starting 2.3.2 early next week?
>
> There is not yet any fix in trunk for the delayed closing of files when
> using HTTP KeepAlive (a pool lifecycle issue).
>
> I'm not sure whether that is a show stopper for an alpha, but Rüdiger
> had the intention of trying to fix it.
I guess this is not a show stopper for alpha but only for GA.
Nevertheless I admit that I lost track, so thanks for the reminder. But I don't know
when I will find time to get back to this issue again. So solution proposals are welcome :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 08.01.2009 19:33, Paul Querna wrote:
> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
>
> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
>
> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
> starting 2.3.2 early next week?
There is not yet any fix in trunk for the delayed closing of files when
using HTTP KeepAlive (a pool lifecycle issue).
I'm not sure whether that is a show stopper for an alpha, but Rüdiger
had the intention of trying to fix it.
See:
http://marc.info/?t=123102466200005&r=1&w=2
It's a problem specific to trunk. You'll quickly run into out of file
descriptors whenever concurrency times KeepAliveRequests is bigger than
the allowed number of FDs (content files are only closed at the end of
the connection instead of end of request).
Regards,
Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
starting 2.3.2 early next week?
-Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Your votes please;
>
> ±1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
>
>
> Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009.