0.8 planning

[Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>]

Now that 0.7 is out, what do people think should go into 0.8?  

I'd like to see Ted's Streaming K-Means for starters, but feel we should continue to trim down as well.

Thoughts?

-Grant

Re: 0.8 planning

[Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>]

What about a quick code clean-up sweep? It's the perfect time because
there are a minimum of existing uncommitted patches.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Now that 0.7 is out, what do people think should go into 0.8?
>>>
>>> I'd like to see Ted's Streaming K-Means for starters, but feel we should continue to trim down as well.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Question: how are you guys approaching releases in general? Are they mostly
>> date driven? Feature driven?
>
> It's primarily been feature driven, but I personally think date driven would be better.



-- 
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com

Re: 0.8 planning

[Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>]

On Jun 21, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Now that 0.7 is out, what do people think should go into 0.8?
>> 
>> I'd like to see Ted's Streaming K-Means for starters, but feel we should continue to trim down as well.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Question: how are you guys approaching releases in general? Are they mostly
> date driven? Feature driven?

It's primarily been feature driven, but I personally think date driven would be better.

Re: 0.8 planning

[Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Now that 0.7 is out, what do people think should go into 0.8?
>
> I'd like to see Ted's Streaming K-Means for starters, but feel we should continue to trim down as well.
>
> Thoughts?

Question: how are you guys approaching releases in general? Are they mostly
date driven? Feature driven?

Thanks,
Roman.

Re: 0.8 planning

[Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>]

This release was considered cleanup, though I do see the number of
JIRAs at an all-time high. I think the focus must still be closing
them (whether by fixing or deciding to not-fix). These are the
'voices' of users and I don't quite feel right focusing on anything
else if it's still piling up.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Now that 0.7 is out, what do people think should go into 0.8?
>
> I'd like to see Ted's Streaming K-Means for starters, but feel we should continue to trim down as well.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Grant