You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> on 2019/01/07 21:13:42 UTC
"Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is available for a JIRA case.
1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22>.
2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22>.
Should we standardize on one?
Which is preferred?
Julian
Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
Posted by Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com>.
> “pull-request-available”
+1
Vladimir
Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
Posted by Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org>.
+1 for standardizing. No opinion on which one we use.
--
Michael Mior
mmior@apache.org
Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 16:13, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> a écrit :
> There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is
> available for a JIRA case.
>
> 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22
> >.
>
> 2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22>.
>
>
> Should we standardize on one?
>
> Which is preferred?
>
> Julian
>
>
Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 for “pull-request-available”.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for "pull-request-available"
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 05:33, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for "pull-request-available"
> >
> > On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> > > There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is
> > available for a JIRA case.
> > >
> > > 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22
> > >.
> > >
> > > 2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22
> > >.
> > >
> > > Should we standardize on one?
> > >
> > > Which is preferred?
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
+1 for "pull-request-available"
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 05:33, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 for "pull-request-available"
>
> On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> > There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is
> available for a JIRA case.
> >
> > 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22
> >.
> >
> > 2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22
> >.
> >
> > Should we standardize on one?
> >
> > Which is preferred?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
>
>
Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
+1 for "pull-request-available"
On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is available for a JIRA case.
>
> 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22>.
>
> 2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22>.
>
> Should we standardize on one?
>
> Which is preferred?
>
> Julian
>
>