You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apex.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/19 12:07:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-674) Change access specifier of DTConfiguration.ValueEntry to private

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15931656#comment-15931656 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-674:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user ajaygit158 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/489

    APEXCORE-674 Change access specifier of DTConfiguration.ValueEntry to private

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ajaygit158/apex-core APEXCORE-674

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/489.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #489
    
----
commit e2b421d9925a8527e5f39a8cc10ca9daab11e0c3
Author: ajaygit158 <aj...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-03-19T10:18:50Z

    APEXCORE-674 Change access specifier of DTConfiguration.ValueEntry to private

----


> Change access specifier of DTConfiguration.ValueEntry to private
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXCORE-674
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-674
>             Project: Apache Apex Core
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ajay Gupta
>            Assignee: Ajay Gupta
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> There is no need for ValueEntry class to be public. DTConfiguration provides methods to access the member variables of ValueEntry class. Also, the setter functions set() and setInternal() will be changed to return void instead of ValueEntry.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)