You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2013/07/22 23:17:26 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Hi,
I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
The eclipse-update-site is
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
The SVN tags are:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
for the eclipse udpate site:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
release candidates.
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
I tested the new update site with current Ruta trunk in development
mode: works but causes different problems. Here, the vm works, but if
the usage of a new one is deactivated, then again a class is not found:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/uima/jcas/tcas/DocumentAnnotation_Type
I should add a note that ruta-2.0.1 does not work with uimaj-2.4.1 and
will fix the problem for the next ruta release.
+1 to release
Peter
On 25.07.2013 16:59, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I tested the runtime plugin with the AE launch configuration delegate
> and it works fine. The problem is most like located in the functionality
> that calculates the classpath for the new java vm.
>
> I wait a bit with my +1 until I know more about the problem.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 25.07.2013 16:45, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> On 25.07.2013 16:42, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> Am 25.07.2013 um 16:40 schrieb Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>:
>>>
>>>> installed Ruta 2.0.1, created project, run simple script - FAILED
>>>>
>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/uima/util/ProcessTrace
>>> If you installed via dropins (or possibly even if not), did you
>>> start Eclipse with -clean?
>> Nope, not manually, but Eclipse should have done it when I restarted it.
>>
>> The runtime plugin is resolved and can be started, and the CDE editor
>> did also work.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
I tested the runtime plugin with the AE launch configuration delegate
and it works fine. The problem is most like located in the functionality
that calculates the classpath for the new java vm.
I wait a bit with my +1 until I know more about the problem.
Peter
On 25.07.2013 16:45, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 25.07.2013 16:42, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2013 um 16:40 schrieb Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>:
>>
>>> installed Ruta 2.0.1, created project, run simple script - FAILED
>>>
>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/uima/util/ProcessTrace
>> If you installed via dropins (or possibly even if not), did you
>> start Eclipse with -clean?
> Nope, not manually, but Eclipse should have done it when I restarted it.
>
> The runtime plugin is resolved and can be started, and the CDE editor
> did also work.
>
> Peter
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 25.07.2013 16:42, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Am 25.07.2013 um 16:40 schrieb Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>:
>
>> installed Ruta 2.0.1, created project, run simple script - FAILED
>>
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/uima/util/ProcessTrace
> If you installed via dropins (or possibly even if not), did you
> start Eclipse with -clean?
Nope, not manually, but Eclipse should have done it when I restarted it.
The runtime plugin is resolved and can be started, and the CDE editor
did also work.
Peter
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <ri...@gmail.com>.
Am 25.07.2013 um 16:40 schrieb Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>:
> installed Ruta 2.0.1, created project, run simple script - FAILED
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/uima/util/ProcessTrace
If you installed via dropins (or possibly even if not), did you
start Eclipse with -clean?
Cheers,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
downloaded source-release, checked out tag, checked some LICENSE/NOTICE
files, compared both, built both - OK
installed both features in Eclipse 3.7.2 (Win64bit), tested descriptor
editor - OK
installed Ruta 2.0.1, created project, run simple script - FAILED
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/uima/util/ProcessTrace
I am still investigating the problem, just wanted to mention it before
the vote is closed...
Peter
On 22.07.2013 23:17, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>
> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>
> The eclipse-update-site is
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>
> The SVN tags are:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>
> for the eclipse udpate site:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>
> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thanks. I've fixed the typo and broken links... (for next release :-) )
-Marshall
On 7/24/2013 2:45 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> +1
>
> Downloaded 2.4.1 binary and verified signatures
>
> Unzipped the binary, set UIMA_HOME, ran
> adjustExamplePaths and documentAnalyzer - All OK
>
> Downloaded eclipse 4.3 and installed uima eclipse plugins - All OK
>
> Downloaded 2.4.1 source, cleared local .m2 and ran mvn clean install - All
> OK
>
> Checked Licenses, README, Release Notes. Found a few dead links in
> Release_Notes.html.
>
> Reviewed new chapter (Compressed Binary CASes) in References.pdf - OK
>
> JC
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> [X] +1 OK to release
>>
>> I downloaded 2.4.1 bin zip - and verified the signature.
>> I downloaded 2.4.1 source release zip, and compared it to the SVN Tag -
>> was OK
>> (minor differences due to building before preparing the source release
>> zip).
>>
>> I unzipped the source release zip and built from sources, after clearing my
>> local .m2 uima entries.
>>
>> I installed into Eclipse 4.3 from the eclipse update site - worked OK -
>> ran the CDE.
>>
>> I did the binary installation verification: unzipped, set UIMA_HOME env
>> var, ran
>> adjustExamplePaths, and ran the documentAnalyzer on examples; all OK
>>
>> I checked licenses: in the source release, bin release, and Eclipse Plugin
>> (in
>> Jar) license for cas-editor-ide - all OK.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get
>> rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include
>> the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so
>> they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the
>> License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>>> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
>>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>>> The eclipse-update-site is
>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
>>>
>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>>> The SVN tags are:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>>>
>>> for the eclipse udpate site:
>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>>> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
>>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
>>>
>>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how
>> to test
>>> release candidates.
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
+1
Downloaded 2.4.1 binary and verified signatures
Unzipped the binary, set UIMA_HOME, ran
adjustExamplePaths and documentAnalyzer - All OK
Downloaded eclipse 4.3 and installed uima eclipse plugins - All OK
Downloaded 2.4.1 source, cleared local .m2 and ran mvn clean install - All
OK
Checked Licenses, README, Release Notes. Found a few dead links in
Release_Notes.html.
Reviewed new chapter (Compressed Binary CASes) in References.pdf - OK
JC
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> I downloaded 2.4.1 bin zip - and verified the signature.
> I downloaded 2.4.1 source release zip, and compared it to the SVN Tag -
> was OK
> (minor differences due to building before preparing the source release
> zip).
>
> I unzipped the source release zip and built from sources, after clearing my
> local .m2 uima entries.
>
> I installed into Eclipse 4.3 from the eclipse update site - worked OK -
> ran the CDE.
>
> I did the binary installation verification: unzipped, set UIMA_HOME env
> var, ran
> adjustExamplePaths, and ran the documentAnalyzer on examples; all OK
>
> I checked licenses: in the source release, bin release, and Eclipse Plugin
> (in
> Jar) license for cas-editor-ide - all OK.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get
> rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include
> the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so
> they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the
> License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
> >
> > The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
> > http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
> >
> > The eclipse-update-site is
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> >
> >
> > The Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
> >
> > The SVN tags are:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
> >
> > for the eclipse udpate site:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
> >
> > The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
> >
> >
> > See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how
> to test
> > release candidates.
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
+1
I downloaded the source zip to Windows, verified the md5 signature, built
it, installed the build, inspected it and ran the adjustExamplePaths.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> I downloaded 2.4.1 bin zip - and verified the signature.
> I downloaded 2.4.1 source release zip, and compared it to the SVN Tag -
> was OK
> (minor differences due to building before preparing the source release
> zip).
>
> I unzipped the source release zip and built from sources, after clearing my
> local .m2 uima entries.
>
> I installed into Eclipse 4.3 from the eclipse update site - worked OK -
> ran the CDE.
>
> I did the binary installation verification: unzipped, set UIMA_HOME env
> var, ran
> adjustExamplePaths, and ran the documentAnalyzer on examples; all OK
>
> I checked licenses: in the source release, bin release, and Eclipse Plugin
> (in
> Jar) license for cas-editor-ide - all OK.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get
> rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include
> the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so
> they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the
> License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
> >
> > The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
> > http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
> >
> > The eclipse-update-site is
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> >
> >
> > The Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
> >
> > The SVN tags are:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
> >
> > for the eclipse udpate site:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
> >
> > The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
> >
> >
> > See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how
> to test
> > release candidates.
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
[X] +1 OK to release
I downloaded 2.4.1 bin zip - and verified the signature.
I downloaded 2.4.1 source release zip, and compared it to the SVN Tag - was OK
(minor differences due to building before preparing the source release zip).
I unzipped the source release zip and built from sources, after clearing my
local .m2 uima entries.
I installed into Eclipse 4.3 from the eclipse update site - worked OK - ran the CDE.
I did the binary installation verification: unzipped, set UIMA_HOME env var, ran
adjustExamplePaths, and ran the documentAnalyzer on examples; all OK
I checked licenses: in the source release, bin release, and Eclipse Plugin (in
Jar) license for cas-editor-ide - all OK.
-Marshall
On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>
> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>
> The eclipse-update-site is
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>
> The SVN tags are:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>
> for the eclipse udpate site:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>
> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Well, all is well -
Brian Fox responded to my plea for resurrecting the dropped repository, and
found it in "trash" and restored it :-).
So, I'll now proceed, carefully...
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 10:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Well, not enough coffee...
>
> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
> so I dropped it.
>
> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>
> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>
> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 7/26/2013 9:50 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> The vote passes:
>>
>> +1: Marshall Schor, Jaroslaw Cwiklik, Burn Lewis, Peter Klügl
>>
>> No other votes received. Thanks to everyone who voted, including those who
>> voted on previous release candidates!
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>>>
>>> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
>>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>>>
>>> The eclipse-update-site is
>>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>>>
>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>>>
>>> The SVN tags are:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>>>
>>> for the eclipse udpate site:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>>>
>>> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
>>>
>>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
>>> release candidates.
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The "research" reveals:
1) the DocumentAnnotation Jar is the JCas cover classes for the "base" (no extra
features merged) version of this CAS Type.
2) It is not explicitly included into the runtime build
3) It comes in as a Jar, and also into the classpath, because it is a dependency
of uimaj-tools, which is explicitly listed as a dependency, and uimaj-tools has
a transitive dependency on the JCas cover classes.
4) The uimaj-tools dependency on the JCas cover classes is only in one spot -
where the FileSystemCollectionReader class uses it to set the "language" into
the CAS.
5) This is easily avoided - since there's a CAS and JCas method to set the
document language; this method uses the non-JCas interface to the CAS to set
this feature.
I'll update the FileSystemCollectionReader (we actually have two versions of
this same class - one had already been updated) to do this, and then I suspect
the uimaj-ep-runtime will no longer have this transitive dependency, and will no
longer include this jar.
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 11:45 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> On 7/26/2013 11:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> On 26.07.2013 17:16, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1027
>> Ah ok, that was before my time :-) I gonna take a look at the issue.
>>
>> The implementation of the type was included in o.a.u.runtime-2.4.0. I
>> have a somewhat internal type that extends that class and now its parent
>> class is gone. Interestingly enough, there are no problems if I start a
>> new vm when launching a Ruta script, because the classpath collector
>> adds the uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar, which it found in the bundle.
>>
>>> I think if your plugin needs this, it needs to provide it - would that work?
>> I could provide it, but I am actually removing the dependencies and the
>> inheritance right now. I see no need to rely on that class.
>>
>> Maybe the jar should be removed from the runtime plugin sometime in future?
> Interesting... This is coming into the build in the step which copies
> "dependencies". It's not, itself, listed as a dependency, but it comes in via
> being a transitive dependency in uimaj-tools.
>
> Have to do a bit more research to figure this out...
>
> -Marshall
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> On 7/26/2013 11:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> Thanks, Peter.
>>>>
>>>> If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history
>>>> behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation
>>>> class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due to
>>>> the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with additional
>>>> features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their
>>>> (potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that having
>>>> the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>> On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
>>>>>
>>>>> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
>>>>> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
>>>>> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
>>>>> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>>>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>>>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>>>>>>> so I dropped it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>>>>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>>>>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 7/26/2013 11:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 26.07.2013 17:16, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1027
> Ah ok, that was before my time :-) I gonna take a look at the issue.
>
> The implementation of the type was included in o.a.u.runtime-2.4.0. I
> have a somewhat internal type that extends that class and now its parent
> class is gone. Interestingly enough, there are no problems if I start a
> new vm when launching a Ruta script, because the classpath collector
> adds the uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar, which it found in the bundle.
>
>> I think if your plugin needs this, it needs to provide it - would that work?
> I could provide it, but I am actually removing the dependencies and the
> inheritance right now. I see no need to rely on that class.
>
> Maybe the jar should be removed from the runtime plugin sometime in future?
Interesting... This is coming into the build in the step which copies
"dependencies". It's not, itself, listed as a dependency, but it comes in via
being a transitive dependency in uimaj-tools.
Have to do a bit more research to figure this out...
-Marshall
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 7/26/2013 11:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> Thanks, Peter.
>>>
>>> If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history
>>> behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation
>>> class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due to
>>> the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with additional
>>> features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their
>>> (potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that having
>>> the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
>>>>
>>>> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
>>>> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
>>>> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
>>>> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>>>>>
>>>>> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>>>>>> so I dropped it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>>>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>>>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 26.07.2013 17:16, Marshall Schor wrote:
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1027
Ah ok, that was before my time :-) I gonna take a look at the issue.
The implementation of the type was included in o.a.u.runtime-2.4.0. I
have a somewhat internal type that extends that class and now its parent
class is gone. Interestingly enough, there are no problems if I start a
new vm when launching a Ruta script, because the classpath collector
adds the uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar, which it found in the bundle.
> I think if your plugin needs this, it needs to provide it - would that work?
I could provide it, but I am actually removing the dependencies and the
inheritance right now. I see no need to rely on that class.
Maybe the jar should be removed from the runtime plugin sometime in future?
Best,
Peter
> -Marshall
>
> On 7/26/2013 11:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Thanks, Peter.
>>
>> If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history
>> behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation
>> class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due to
>> the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with additional
>> features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their
>> (potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that having
>> the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
>>>
>>> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
>>> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
>>> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
>>> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>>>>
>>>> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>>>>> so I dropped it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1027
I think if your plugin needs this, it needs to provide it - would that work?
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 11:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thanks, Peter.
>
> If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history
> behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation
> class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due to
> the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with additional
> features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their
> (potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that having
> the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
>>
>> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
>> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
>> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
>> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>>>
>>> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>>>
>>>> -- Richard
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>>>
>>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>>>> so I dropped it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>>>
>>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thanks, Peter.
If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history
behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation
class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due to
the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with additional
features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their
(potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that having
the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this.
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
>
> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>>
>> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>>
>> -Marshall
>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>>
>>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>>
>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>>> so I dropped it.
>>>>
>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>>
>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>>
>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway:
the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five
of them as embedded and as the additional classpath.
uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents
other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation.
Best,
Peter
On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
>
> to emulate what the release process did :-)...
>
> -Marshall
> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>>
>> -- Richard
>>
>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>>
>>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>>
>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>>> so I dropped it.
>>>
>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>>
>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>>
>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>>
>>> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I try mvn deploy -Papache-release
to emulate what the release process did :-)...
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>
> -- Richard
>
> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>
>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>
>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>> so I dropped it.
>>
>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>
>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>
>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>
>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
worth a try :-) THanks!
On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
>
> -- Richard
>
> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>
>> Well, not enough coffee...
>>
>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
>> so I dropped it.
>>
>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>>
>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>>
>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>>
>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <ri...@gmail.com>.
Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no?
-- Richard
Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
> Well, not enough coffee...
>
> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
> so I dropped it.
>
> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
>
> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
>
> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
>
> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Well, not enough coffee...
There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and thought,
hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm mistaken,
so I dropped it.
The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima".
So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging Nexus
repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository mailing list
if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release candidate...).
If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release...
-Marshall
On 7/26/2013 9:50 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> The vote passes:
>
> +1: Marshall Schor, Jaroslaw Cwiklik, Burn Lewis, Peter Klügl
>
> No other votes received. Thanks to everyone who voted, including those who
> voted on previous release candidates!
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>>
>> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>>
>> The eclipse-update-site is
>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>>
>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>>
>> The SVN tags are:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>>
>> for the eclipse udpate site:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>>
>> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
>>
>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
>> release candidates.
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The vote passes:
+1: Marshall Schor, Jaroslaw Cwiklik, Burn Lewis, Peter Klügl
No other votes received. Thanks to everyone who voted, including those who
voted on previous release candidates!
-Marshall
On 7/22/2013 5:17 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted rc-4. There were 2 minor changes: one to the README to get rid of some tabs, and the other to include the License/Notice that include the BSD license for the SVG Icons in the two projects that use them, so they show up in their Jar files in the META-INF/ directory as the License/Notice files (cas editor, and cas editor ide).
>
> The source and binary zips/tars are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/>
>
> The eclipse-update-site is
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/2.4.1SDK-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/
>
> The SVN tags are:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.4.1-rc4/ and
>
> for the eclipse udpate site:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.4.1-rc4/
>
> The issues resolved/closed: 81 issues
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.1SDK%22%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29>
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>