You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@polygene.apache.org by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> on 2017/07/23 04:39:49 UTC
Logo Contest
I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask people
to rate these;
https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments, colors,
fonts and relative placements.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I like last proposal from Paul.
On color chosing what do you think on make some experiments with
[this](https://color.adobe.com/create/color-wheel/?base=2&rule=Complementary&selected=0&name=My%20Color%20Theme&mode=rgb&rgbvalues=0.9647058823529412,0,0.043137254901960784,1,0.1692610682630028,0.206407931064028,1,0,0.0447154471542035,0,0.7,0.18039576622172715,0,1,0.25770823745961025&swatchOrder=0,1,2,3,4)
?
Even with orange (and its complementary blue color) could be good, but
not a big deal :-) ...
Bye
2017-08-02 13:11 GMT+02:00 Paul Merlin <pa...@apache.org>:
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>> I have tried to make myself an opinion... not easy.
>>
>> But, I would like to see
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879468/63_3.png
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879296/63_3.png
>>
>> with the RED color. Possibly a little bit "thicker" when used on white back
>> ground.
>>
>> And I think the Black for text works.
>
> I like the last proposal with a thicker logo and a color emphasis on
> "Polygene":
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879597/84.png
>
> I tried to make it work on black background very quickly and i think it
> will do.
>
> When it comes to color I'd prefer green over red, I'd be fine with red
> though, I don't like orange.
>
> It would be nice to see the thicker logo variant with the color emphasis
> on "Polygene" for RED and GREEN on both WHITE & BLACK backgrounds.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Cheers
>
> /Paul
>
>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Paul Merlin <pa...@apache.org>.
Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> I have tried to make myself an opinion... not easy.
>
> But, I would like to see
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879468/63_3.png
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879296/63_3.png
>
> with the RED color. Possibly a little bit "thicker" when used on white back
> ground.
>
> And I think the Black for text works.
I like the last proposal with a thicker logo and a color emphasis on
"Polygene":
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879597/84.png
I tried to make it work on black background very quickly and i think it
will do.
When it comes to color I'd prefer green over red, I'd be fine with red
though, I don't like orange.
It would be nice to see the thicker logo variant with the color emphasis
on "Polygene" for RED and GREEN on both WHITE & BLACK backgrounds.
My 2 cents
Cheers
/Paul
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
I have tried to make myself an opinion... not easy.
But, I would like to see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879468/63_3.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879296/63_3.png
with the RED color. Possibly a little bit "thicker" when used on white back
ground.
And I think the Black for text works.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Georg Ragaller <qi...@dev.ragaller.org>
wrote:
> If we declare the designer of #63 & #83 as winner, then I personally would
> prefer #83, because the logo part is more eye-catching for me.
>
> Cheers,
> Georg
>
>
> Am 27. Juli 2017 01:57:58 MESZ schrieb Niclas Hedhman <he...@gmail.com>:
> >Ok, good to know that people agree with a responsive designer.
> >
> >I think I simply declare her winner (so she get paid) and then I'll
> >request
> >a few more variants and post those on Jira and discuss further there...
> >
> >Ok?
> >
> >Niclas
> >
> >
> >On Jul 27, 2017 06:03, "Sandro Martini" <sa...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >I prefer too 63 and 83 even because I'm not sure that 40 on a light
> >background would be so good (and hadn't enough time to try myself) ...
> >
> >Even for me a more reactive designer is an important point.
> >
> >So what do you think on a second poll only with our top Logos ?
> >And maybe we could write somewhere some plus and doubts on anyone of
> >them ?
> >
> >Bye,
> >Sandro
> >
> >Il 26/Lug/2017 20:27, "Stanislav Muhametsin" <
> >stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> ha scritto:
> >
> >I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
> >Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
> >vote).
> >However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
> >
> >
> >On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
> >> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
> >>
> >> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
> >>
> >> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
> >> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
> >> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
> >>
> >> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
> >>
> >> My 2 cents
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> >>
> >>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
> >>>
> >>> Most votes; #40
> >>> Most 5 star; #40
> >>> Highest average; #63
> >>>
> >>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
> >>>
> >>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63
> >(and
> >>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a
> >lot
> >of
> >>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready
> >to
> >take
> >>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been
> >much
> >>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
> >>>
> >>> What does others think?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Niclas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman
> ><ni...@hedhman.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do
> >so,
> >>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman
> ><ni...@hedhman.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I
> >ask
> >>>>> people to rate these;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread
> >and we
> >>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller
> >adjustments,
> >>>>> colors,
> >>>>> fonts and relative placements.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Georg Ragaller <qi...@dev.ragaller.org>.
If we declare the designer of #63 & #83 as winner, then I personally would prefer #83, because the logo part is more eye-catching for me.
Cheers,
Georg
Am 27. Juli 2017 01:57:58 MESZ schrieb Niclas Hedhman <he...@gmail.com>:
>Ok, good to know that people agree with a responsive designer.
>
>I think I simply declare her winner (so she get paid) and then I'll
>request
>a few more variants and post those on Jira and discuss further there...
>
>Ok?
>
>Niclas
>
>
>On Jul 27, 2017 06:03, "Sandro Martini" <sa...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>I prefer too 63 and 83 even because I'm not sure that 40 on a light
>background would be so good (and hadn't enough time to try myself) ...
>
>Even for me a more reactive designer is an important point.
>
>So what do you think on a second poll only with our top Logos ?
>And maybe we could write somewhere some plus and doubts on anyone of
>them ?
>
>Bye,
>Sandro
>
>Il 26/Lug/2017 20:27, "Stanislav Muhametsin" <
>stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> ha scritto:
>
>I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
>Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
>vote).
>However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
>
>
>On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
>>
>>
>> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
>> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
>>
>> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
>>
>> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
>> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
>> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
>>
>> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
>>
>> My 2 cents
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>>
>>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>>>
>>> Most votes; #40
>>> Most 5 star; #40
>>> Highest average; #63
>>>
>>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>>>
>>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63
>(and
>>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a
>lot
>of
>>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready
>to
>take
>>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been
>much
>>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>>>
>>> What does others think?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Niclas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman
><ni...@hedhman.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do
>so,
>>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman
><ni...@hedhman.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I
>ask
>>>>> people to rate these;
>>>>>
>>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>>>>
>>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread
>and we
>>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller
>adjustments,
>>>>> colors,
>>>>> fonts and relative placements.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <he...@gmail.com>.
Ok, good to know that people agree with a responsive designer.
I think I simply declare her winner (so she get paid) and then I'll request
a few more variants and post those on Jira and discuss further there...
Ok?
Niclas
On Jul 27, 2017 06:03, "Sandro Martini" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I prefer too 63 and 83 even because I'm not sure that 40 on a light
background would be so good (and hadn't enough time to try myself) ...
Even for me a more reactive designer is an important point.
So what do you think on a second poll only with our top Logos ?
And maybe we could write somewhere some plus and doubts on anyone of them ?
Bye,
Sandro
Il 26/Lug/2017 20:27, "Stanislav Muhametsin" <
stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> ha scritto:
I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
vote).
However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
>
>
> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
>
> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
>
> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
>
> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>
>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>>
>> Most votes; #40
>> Most 5 star; #40
>> Highest average; #63
>>
>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>>
>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63 (and
>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot
of
>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to
take
>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>>
>> What does others think?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
>>>> people to rate these;
>>>>
>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>>>
>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments,
>>>> colors,
>>>> fonts and relative placements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I prefer too 63 and 83 even because I'm not sure that 40 on a light
background would be so good (and hadn't enough time to try myself) ...
Even for me a more reactive designer is an important point.
So what do you think on a second poll only with our top Logos ?
And maybe we could write somewhere some plus and doubts on anyone of them ?
Bye,
Sandro
Il 26/Lug/2017 20:27, "Stanislav Muhametsin" <
stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> ha scritto:
I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
vote).
However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
>
>
> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
>
> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
>
> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
>
> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>
>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>>
>> Most votes; #40
>> Most 5 star; #40
>> Highest average; #63
>>
>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>>
>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63 (and
>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot of
>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to take
>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>>
>> What does others think?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
>>>> people to rate these;
>>>>
>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>>>
>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments,
>>>> colors,
>>>> fonts and relative placements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Stanislav Muhametsin <st...@zest.mail.kapsi.fi>.
I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
vote).
However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
>
>
> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
>
> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
>
> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
>
> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>>
>> Most votes; #40
>> Most 5 star; #40
>> Highest average; #63
>>
>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>>
>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63
>> (and
>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a
>> lot of
>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to
>> take
>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>>
>> What does others think?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
>>>> people to rate these;
>>>>
>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>>>
>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread
>>>> and we
>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments,
>>>> colors,
>>>> fonts and relative placements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>
>
>
>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Paul Merlin <pa...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
My 2 cents
Cheers
Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>
> Most votes; #40
> Most 5 star; #40
> Highest average; #63
>
> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>
> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63
> (and
> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot
> of
> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to
> take
> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>
> What does others think?
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
> wrote:
>
>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
>>> people to rate these;
>>>
>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>>
>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and
>>> we
>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments,
>>> colors,
>>> fonts and relative placements.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --
>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Jiri Jetmar <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
#40
It is really cool. Will also look nice black/white. It makes curious!
my opinion..
Cheers,
jj
2017-07-26 16:38 GMT+02:00 Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>:
> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
>
> Most votes; #40
> Most 5 star; #40
> Highest average; #63
>
> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
>
> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63 (and
> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot of
> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to take
> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
>
> What does others think?
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
> wrote:
>
> > There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
> > because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
> >> people to rate these;
> >>
> >> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
> >>
> >> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
> >> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments,
> colors,
> >> fonts and relative placements.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> --
> >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
I hereby declare the poll concluded.
Most votes; #40
Most 5 star; #40
Highest average; #63
I call that somewhat inconclusive.
Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63 (and
#83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot of
designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to take
on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much
more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
What does others think?
Cheers
Niclas
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask
>> people to rate these;
>>
>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>>
>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments, colors,
>> fonts and relative placements.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Logo Contest
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so,
because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask people
> to rate these;
>
> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
>
> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and we
> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments, colors,
> fonts and relative placements.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java