You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ant.apache.org by Dwayne Schultz <dw...@schultz.net> on 2003/03/11 01:11:09 UTC
${basedir} prepended to properties?
I am writing a myproj_build.xml file that will go in a jar to help
users use our product. Someone started putting ${basedir} in front of
some of the properties but I think it is unnecessary. We have
something like this:
<property name="deploymentFile" value="${basedir}/conf/colle.cds"/>
It works on my system if I just remove the ${basedir}. Can anyone
comment on this?
Dwayne
=============================
Use the right kind of glue
http://colle.sf.net
Re: ${basedir} prepended to properties?
Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:11 am, Dwayne Schultz wrote:
> I am writing a myproj_build.xml file that will go in a jar to help
> users use our product. Someone started putting ${basedir} in front of
> some of the properties but I think it is unnecessary. We have
> something like this:
>
> <property name="deploymentFile" value="${basedir}/conf/colle.cds"/>
>
> It works on my system if I just remove the ${basedir}. Can anyone
> comment on this?
>
It depends on what you want deploymentFile to contain and how you use the
property.
Using ${basedir} is not necessary. If you are passing the property value into
Ant tasks that expect a File, it will be resolved against the basedir
automatically. "Resolving" is slightly more sophisticated than prepending
${basedir} since it will handle cases where the value is an absolute path ,
etc.
In some cases you want to fix the value of the property to the full path. You
may be passing the property to a sub-build with a different basedir, for
example. In that case you should use the form
<property name="deploymentFile" location="conf/colle.cds"/>
This will perform the resolution at the time the property is created. Check
out the <property> task documentation.
Conor