You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by "Reto Bachmann-Gmür (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/01/10 11:38:12 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (CLEREZZA-727) Error in hashCode implementation
in org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.impl.TripleImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Reto Bachmann-Gmür resolved CLEREZZA-727.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Fixed definition and implementation. This should make clerezz faster! Thanks for reporting!
> Error in hashCode implementation in org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.impl.TripleImpl
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLEREZZA-727
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-727
> Project: Clerezza
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rdf.core
> Reporter: Giuseppe Miscione
> Assignee: Reto Bachmann-Gmür
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: performance
>
> hashCode of --- class is implemented as
> public int hashCode() {
> return (subject.hashCode() >> 1) ^ subject.hashCode() ^ (subject.hashCode() << 1);
> }
> and it's using only the subject part of the triple. It's correct implementation should be:
> public int hashCode() {
> return (subject.hashCode() >> 1) ^ predicate.hashCode() ^ (object.hashCode() << 1);
> }
> The actual implementation works well with its corresponding equals method (the methods are coherent) but it can yield to performance degradation when using a lot of TripleImpl objects with the same subject as HashMap key.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira