RE: Log4j as "Source-Code Level" or "Compiled (black-box) Component"Reuse?

[Roger Kjensrud <ro...@cj.com>]

Kevin,

I would be very interested in a JDBC appender....

Thanks,

Roger Kjensrud

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Steppe [mailto:ksteppe@pacbell.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: LOG4J Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Log4j as "Source-Code Level" or "Compiled (black-box)
> Component"Reuse?
>
>
> Personally I try to use packages as reused components as much as
> possible.  Open
> Source projects tend to lack the extensive documentation generated by a
> commercial projects documentation team so I find I often need to
> 'look under the
> hood' to understand how things should get used.  For extensions
> polymorphism is
> definately the way to go and having the source makes it -so- much
> easier to know
> how to write a subclass.  Speaking of extensions, I have just written a
> JDBCAppender for my employer.  If people are interested I could
> easily replace
> the employer specific database stuff with standard JDBC and contribute it.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>