You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@googlemail.com> on 2011/03/14 21:53:38 UTC
Roadmap for 2.3
Hi,
Any ideas for 2.3 ?
My two cents, deprecate DOJO and CodeBehind
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3591
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3592
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
Another thing to keep in mind here... The way the conventions plugin
works is that it hooks in UnknownHandlers. If conventions is to become
the new default, I think a classpath-scanning ConfigurationProvider
should be created (IMHO).
-Wes
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Philip Luppens
<ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Ben McCann <bm...@google.com> wrote:
>> I didn't realize you could setup Struts2 without XML. That sounds fantastic
>> to me. I'd vote in favor of moving it to the core or at least highlighting
>> it in the documentation. Having to do configuration in XML is the one thing
>> I dislike about Struts2 despite being a longtime and happy user of the
>> framework. I much prefer doing configuration in code or via annotations.
>> FYI, Matt, I've been using extensionless URLs with Struts2 for awhile
>> without the plugin. Try doing something like <constant
>> name="struts.action.extension" value="action,,"/>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
> Funny, for me it's the exact opposite: I much prefer to have my
> configuration done in XML. Centralized (but split up per role, for
> example), easily searchable, bulk operations, changeable without
> requiring recompilations, ... especially for larger or fast-moving
> applications, the XML configuration files are much clearer than the
> annotation counterpart.
>
> My 2 cents,
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> --
> "We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand."
> - Randy Pausch
>
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
Ask me for a quote!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Ben McCann <bm...@google.com> wrote:
> I didn't realize you could setup Struts2 without XML. That sounds fantastic
> to me. I'd vote in favor of moving it to the core or at least highlighting
> it in the documentation. Having to do configuration in XML is the one thing
> I dislike about Struts2 despite being a longtime and happy user of the
> framework. I much prefer doing configuration in code or via annotations.
> FYI, Matt, I've been using extensionless URLs with Struts2 for awhile
> without the plugin. Try doing something like <constant
> name="struts.action.extension" value="action,,"/>
>
> [snip]
>
Funny, for me it's the exact opposite: I much prefer to have my
configuration done in XML. Centralized (but split up per role, for
example), easily searchable, bulk operations, changeable without
requiring recompilations, ... especially for larger or fast-moving
applications, the XML configuration files are much clearer than the
annotation counterpart.
My 2 cents,
Phil
--
"We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand."
- Randy Pausch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Ben McCann <bm...@google.com>.
I didn't realize you could setup Struts2 without XML. That sounds fantastic
to me. I'd vote in favor of moving it to the core or at least highlighting
it in the documentation. Having to do configuration in XML is the one thing
I dislike about Struts2 despite being a longtime and happy user of the
framework. I much prefer doing configuration in code or via annotations.
FYI, Matt, I've been using extensionless URLs with Struts2 for awhile
without the plugin. Try doing something like <constant
name="struts.action.extension" value="action,,"/>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>
> wrote:
> > If the conventions plugin allows for no XML and extensionless URLs, I'd
> like
> > to see it rolled into the and defaulted. I'm happy to endure the pain of
> > upgrading for those two features.
> >
>
> Or you could use the plugin...
>
> The way I see it, there are a few books out there right now that
> provide reference and instruction on how to use Struts 2. Some may or
> may not mention the conventions plugin, but if we make the conventions
> plugin's behavior the default, then anyone buying any of the books and
> downloading the latest zips will be sorely disappointed when their
> learning experience goes poorly.
>
> I think if we want it to be more prominent, we should make it more
> prominent (in the docs, on struts.a.o, etc.). And I think it would be
> fine to make it a default for the next major version. When I mention
> the next major version, I'm not indicating that we should wait... I
> just think that's why we have major.minor.build versioning.
>
>
> --
> Wes Wannemacher
>
> Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
> Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
> Ask me for a quote!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> If the conventions plugin allows for no XML and extensionless URLs, I'd like
> to see it rolled into the and defaulted. I'm happy to endure the pain of
> upgrading for those two features.
>
Or you could use the plugin...
The way I see it, there are a few books out there right now that
provide reference and instruction on how to use Struts 2. Some may or
may not mention the conventions plugin, but if we make the conventions
plugin's behavior the default, then anyone buying any of the books and
downloading the latest zips will be sorely disappointed when their
learning experience goes poorly.
I think if we want it to be more prominent, we should make it more
prominent (in the docs, on struts.a.o, etc.). And I think it would be
fine to make it a default for the next major version. When I mention
the next major version, I'm not indicating that we should wait... I
just think that's why we have major.minor.build versioning.
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
Ask me for a quote!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
If the conventions plugin allows for no XML and extensionless URLs, I'd like
to see it rolled into the and defaulted. I'm happy to endure the pain of
upgrading for those two features.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> I'm with Dave and Chris... I like the conventions plugin, but I think
> it is too big of a change to make it a new default.
>
> It could potentially be the kind of thing that we look at for Struts 3
>
> -Wes
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm with Dave on this one (obviously)
> > (*Chris*)
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm still against having it be the default, though. If it's enabled
> >> with a single switch, I'd be okay with that.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
>
>
> --
> Wes Wannemacher
>
> Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
> Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
> Ask me for a quote!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
I'm with Dave and Chris... I like the conventions plugin, but I think
it is too big of a change to make it a new default.
It could potentially be the kind of thing that we look at for Struts 3
-Wes
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm with Dave on this one (obviously)
> (*Chris*)
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm still against having it be the default, though. If it's enabled
>> with a single switch, I'd be okay with that.
>>
>> Dave
>>
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
Ask me for a quote!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com>.
I'm with Dave on this one (obviously)
(*Chris*)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still against having it be the default, though. If it's enabled
> with a single switch, I'd be okay with that.
>
> Dave
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > My intention is not to replace the XML Configuration. Both configurations
> > ways work well together.
> >
> > I only like to see the convention configuration as default. Because with
> > Convention
> > Plugin it is much more easier for the user to get involved with Struts2.
> >
> > And this Feature is not so well known by new users like it can be.
> >
> > I know moving it to core and make it to the default configuration is only
> > for marketing reasons.
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> > -----
> >
> > --------------
> > web: http://www.jgeppert.com
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3715337.html
> > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
I'm still against having it be the default, though. If it's enabled
with a single switch, I'd be okay with that.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> My intention is not to replace the XML Configuration. Both configurations
> ways work well together.
>
> I only like to see the convention configuration as default. Because with
> Convention
> Plugin it is much more easier for the user to get involved with Struts2.
>
> And this Feature is not so well known by new users like it can be.
>
> I know moving it to core and make it to the default configuration is only
> for marketing reasons.
>
> Johannes
>
> -----
>
> --------------
> web: http://www.jgeppert.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
> --
> View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3715337.html
> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>.
My intention is not to replace the XML Configuration. Both configurations
ways work well together.
I only like to see the convention configuration as default. Because with
Convention
Plugin it is much more easier for the user to get involved with Struts2.
And this Feature is not so well known by new users like it can be.
I know moving it to core and make it to the default configuration is only
for marketing reasons.
Johannes
-----
--------------
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3715337.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by John Lindal <li...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1
I've actually extended the DTD with additional configuration for security
features. The XML is easier to review for errors and ommissions because it
is centralized.
John
On 3/15/11 9:25 AM, "Steven Benitez" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I love annotations for a lot of things, but I also prefer the XML based
> configuration for actions, interceptors, results, etc.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There's a tension between large-scale maintainability and small-scale
>> "hurry!" apps.
>>
>> I think it's important that S2 can do both, and our documentation
>> should reflect its suitability for each style, and provide insight
>> and/or mechanisms into transitioning between the two (struts.xml from
>> annotations, anyone, to convert between apps writ small and large?)
>> and the various advantages/drawbacks of each.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> -1. I find programming by religion (or convention or whatever you want
>> to
>>> call it when the computer tries to guess what you mean) to be a very bad
>>> long term decision. For small programs it works out fine, but for
>> anything
>>> with any scale you start to run into unimagined problems because someone
>>> named something inconveniently. I feel making that part of the main flow
>> of
>>> a framework as important as Struts sends the wrong message about Struts'
>>> main purpose, which should be making enterprise class web applications.
>> But
>>> then again, that's just one man's humble rantings.
>>> (*Chris*)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
>>>> into
>>>> core?
>>>>
>>>> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that
>> Struts2
>>>> is
>>>> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>>>>
>>>> Johannes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
>>>> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Steven Benitez <st...@gmail.com>.
I love annotations for a lot of things, but I also prefer the XML based
configuration for actions, interceptors, results, etc.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a tension between large-scale maintainability and small-scale
> "hurry!" apps.
>
> I think it's important that S2 can do both, and our documentation
> should reflect its suitability for each style, and provide insight
> and/or mechanisms into transitioning between the two (struts.xml from
> annotations, anyone, to convert between apps writ small and large?)
> and the various advantages/drawbacks of each.
>
> Dave
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > -1. I find programming by religion (or convention or whatever you want
> to
> > call it when the computer tries to guess what you mean) to be a very bad
> > long term decision. For small programs it works out fine, but for
> anything
> > with any scale you start to run into unimagined problems because someone
> > named something inconveniently. I feel making that part of the main flow
> of
> > a framework as important as Struts sends the wrong message about Struts'
> > main purpose, which should be making enterprise class web applications.
> But
> > then again, that's just one man's humble rantings.
> > (*Chris*)
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
> >> into
> >> core?
> >>
> >> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that
> Struts2
> >> is
> >> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
> >>
> >> Johannes
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
> >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
There's a tension between large-scale maintainability and small-scale
"hurry!" apps.
I think it's important that S2 can do both, and our documentation
should reflect its suitability for each style, and provide insight
and/or mechanisms into transitioning between the two (struts.xml from
annotations, anyone, to convert between apps writ small and large?)
and the various advantages/drawbacks of each.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1. I find programming by religion (or convention or whatever you want to
> call it when the computer tries to guess what you mean) to be a very bad
> long term decision. For small programs it works out fine, but for anything
> with any scale you start to run into unimagined problems because someone
> named something inconveniently. I feel making that part of the main flow of
> a framework as important as Struts sends the wrong message about Struts'
> main purpose, which should be making enterprise class web applications. But
> then again, that's just one man's humble rantings.
> (*Chris*)
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
>> into
>> core?
>>
>> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that Struts2
>> is
>> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
>> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Chris Pratt <th...@gmail.com>.
-1. I find programming by religion (or convention or whatever you want to
call it when the computer tries to guess what you mean) to be a very bad
long term decision. For small programs it works out fine, but for anything
with any scale you start to run into unimagined problems because someone
named something inconveniently. I feel making that part of the main flow of
a framework as important as Struts sends the wrong message about Struts'
main purpose, which should be making enterprise class web applications. But
then again, that's just one man's humble rantings.
(*Chris*)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
> into
> core?
>
> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that Struts2
> is
> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>
> Johannes
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
And it's easier to create documentation automatically. (Not way
easier, but still.)
I guess I'd be opposed to making Convention be "enabled" by default,
but we could certainly make an effort to highlight in a more effective
way.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Ian Roughley <ia...@fdar.com> wrote:
> In development mode, using XML, you can also make real-time production configuration changes without
> needing to restart :-)
>
> /Ian
>
> On 03/15/2011 07:27 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
>> we find also using old xml is easier thatn @Action/@Result
>>
>> what happen if we wanna to change the result from velocity to jsp, to jasper
>>
>> the new one cannot
>>
>> F
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara <
>> maurizio.cucchiara@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Johannes,
>>> I don't know, I'd prefer to keep the core the more slight as possible
>>> (but my opinion could be biased cause I am an old fashion XML coder :)
>>> )
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 March 2011 11:03, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
>>> into
>>>> core?
>>>>
>>>> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that
>>> Struts2
>>>> is
>>>> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>>>>
>>>> Johannes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
>>>> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Maurizio Cucchiara
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Ian Roughley <ia...@fdar.com>.
In development mode, using XML, you can also make real-time production configuration changes without
needing to restart :-)
/Ian
On 03/15/2011 07:27 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
> we find also using old xml is easier thatn @Action/@Result
>
> what happen if we wanna to change the result from velocity to jsp, to jasper
>
> the new one cannot
>
> F
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara <
> maurizio.cucchiara@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Johannes,
>> I don't know, I'd prefer to keep the core the more slight as possible
>> (but my opinion could be biased cause I am an old fashion XML coder :)
>> )
>>
>>
>> On 15 March 2011 11:03, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
>> into
>>> core?
>>>
>>> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that
>> Struts2
>>> is
>>> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>>>
>>> Johannes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
>>> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Maurizio Cucchiara
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Frans Thamura <fr...@meruvian.org>.
we find also using old xml is easier thatn @Action/@Result
what happen if we wanna to change the result from velocity to jsp, to jasper
the new one cannot
F
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara <
maurizio.cucchiara@gmail.com> wrote:
> Johannes,
> I don't know, I'd prefer to keep the core the more slight as possible
> (but my opinion could be biased cause I am an old fashion XML coder :)
> )
>
>
> On 15 March 2011 11:03, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin
> into
> > core?
> >
> > Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that
> Struts2
> > is
> > an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
> > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Maurizio Cucchiara <ma...@gmail.com>.
Johannes,
I don't know, I'd prefer to keep the core the more slight as possible
(but my opinion could be biased cause I am an old fashion XML coder :)
)
On 15 March 2011 11:03, Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin into
> core?
>
> Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that Struts2
> is
> an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
>
> Johannes
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Maurizio Cucchiara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Roadmap for 2.3
Posted by Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>.
Only a thought, what are you thinking about moving the convention plugin into
core?
Many People don't know the convention plugin and offen i hear that Struts2
is
an old fashion XML configuration MVC Framework.
Johannes
--
View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-2-3-tp3609943p3695351.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org