[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL

["Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=all ]
     
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-180:
--------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed, we now support the WSDL 2.0 syntax described in the spec.
I left the old syntax for now to avoid breaking those who are using it.

> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: TUSCANY-180
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
>      Project: Tuscany
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Specification
>     Versions: Java-M1
>     Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>     Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>      Fix For: Java-M1

>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira