You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oodt.apache.org by "Imesha Sudasingha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/02 08:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Reopened] (OODT-693) Consolidate logging in OODT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Imesha Sudasingha reopened OODT-693:
------------------------------------
Skill Level: Newcomer (Easy) - Everyone can do this (was: Don't Know (Unsure) - The default level)
IMO, all OODT logs should go through one framework. As [~lewismc] suggested, me too prefer SLF4J since it supports multiple underlying implementations which can be altered according to our preferences. Furthermore, in `java.util.logging`, we have to do string concatenation ourselves, which is tiresome and makes the code ugly.
So, I think this should be done in near future. At least as a future GSoC project as [~chrismattmann] mentioned. By having proper logging, OODT will be easier to debug.
> Consolidate logging in OODT
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: OODT-693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693
> Project: OODT
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: file manager
> Affects Versions: 0.6
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> Right now we seem to be using an array of inconsistent logging frameworks.
> Personally I really like the Slf4j over Log4j setup. Extremely easy to work with, easy to configure and Log4j 2.X is dynamite so if we can implement that then we are laughing.
> This is by no means a trivial task.
> It is however an important one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)