You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2008/05/02 20:11:51 UTC

ldap patch

Graham and Eric,

please untangle

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41352

for us?  This bug commentary no longer makes sense :(

Bill

Re: ldap patch

Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>
> Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >
> > > please untangle
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41352
> > >
> > > for us?  This bug commentary no longer makes sense :(
> > >
> >
> > Comment #3 means ignore comment #2.
> >
>
>  Which leaves the status of the attached patches as *WHAT*?  Invalid?
>  then invalidate it already :(
>

I think my first patch is good/necessary, the 2nd patch is definitely
meant for an unrelated PR.  I must have missed or lost track of the
activity on the bug.

Thanks for the followup

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

Re: ldap patch

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.

Graham Leggett wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>> please untangle
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41352
>>
>> for us?  This bug commentary no longer makes sense :(
> 
> Comment #3 means ignore comment #2.

Which leaves the status of the attached patches as *WHAT*?  Invalid?
then invalidate it already :(

Re: ldap patch

Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> please untangle
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41352
> 
> for us?  This bug commentary no longer makes sense :(

Comment #3 means ignore comment #2.

Regards,
Graham
--