You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Piotr Nowojski (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/04/16 11:26:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-37670) Watermark alignment can deadlock job if there are no more splits to be assigned
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Piotr Nowojski closed FLINK-37670.
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.20.2
2.1.0
2.0.1
Resolution: Fixed
> Watermark alignment can deadlock job if there are no more splits to be assigned
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-37670
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37670
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: API / DataStream, Runtime / Task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.19.2, 1.20.1
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Assignee: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.20.2, 2.1.0, 2.0.1
>
>
> {{SourceCoordinator#announceCombinedWatermark}} stops announcing combined watermark if {{context.hasNoMoreSplits(subtaskId)}} returns true.
> {noformat}
> for (Integer subtaskId : subTaskIds) {
> // when subtask have been finished, do not send event.
> if (!context.hasNoMoreSplits(subtaskId)) {
> // Subtask maybe during deploying or restarting, so we only send
> // WatermarkAlignmentEvent to ready task to avoid period task fail
> // (Java-ThreadPoolExecutor will not schedule the period task if it throws an
> // exception).
> context.sendEventToSourceOperatorIfTaskReady(
> subtaskId, new WatermarkAlignmentEvent(maxAllowedWatermark));
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> Which means new max allowed watermark will not be announced anymore, preventing sources from making progress. The intention was to prevent failures caused by tasks not running:
> {noformat}
> Caused by: org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.TaskNotRunningException: Task is not running, but in state FINISHED
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.deliverOperatorEvent(Task.java:1613) ~[flink-runtime-1.19-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutor.sendOperatorEventToTask(TaskExecutor.java:1478) ~[flink-runtime-1.19-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor6.invoke(Unknown Source) ~[?:?]
> at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:?]
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566) ~[?:?]
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.pekko.PekkoRpcActor.lambda$handleRpcInvocation$1(PekkoRpcActor.java:318) ~[flink-rpc-akka8c031913-bb13-4662-a216-58134efdb2d9.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.concurrent.ClassLoadingUtils.runWithContextClassLoader(ClassLoadingUtils.java:83) ~[flink-rpc-core-1.19-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.pekko.PekkoRpcActor.handleRpcInvocation(PekkoRpcActor.java:316) ~[flink-rpc-akka8c031913-bb13-4662-a216-58134efdb2d9.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.pekko.PekkoRpcActor.handleRpcMessage(PekkoRpcActor.java:229) ~[flink-rpc-akka8c031913-bb13-4662-a216-58134efdb2d9.jar:1.19-SNAPSHOT]
> {noformat}
> but:
> # This is an incorrect check. This, contrary to the comment, doesn't check if all subtasks have finished, but only that source coordinator has no more splits to assign.
> # Even if it was checking if all subtasks finished, that wouldn't work because:
> * one subtask can be finished, while others are still running
> * there can be race conditions between sending an operator event to a running operator and that operator switching to finished
> I think, at least for some non critical events, we need to just ignore {{TaskNotRunningException}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)