You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/28 06:56:28 UTC

Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1

I believe the restriction has been released. I'll delete this branch
tomorrow unless someone says otherwise.

Thanks,
Nick

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:03 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for the update, Ram. Would you mind following up with INFRA to get a
> more definitive answer?
>
> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S <
> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > They have closed INFRA-10920 and pointed me to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10800.  But there also there
> > is no conclusion on it and I think the ETA for deleting a branch is not
> yet
> > finalized. I am not aware of the background as why it was stopped.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ram
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* James Taylor [mailto:jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jamestaylor@apache.org');>]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:52 AM
> > *To:* dev@phoenix.apache.org
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@phoenix.apache.org');>; Vasudevan,
> > Ramkrishna S
> > *Subject:* Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, that was pushed in error.  INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it, but
> > now it's closed with a link to another JIRA that links more JIRAs - it's
> > unclear what the resolution is.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ram - would you mind following up on that?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ndimiduk@apache.org');>> wrote:
> >
> > Heya,
> >
> > I see we now have a branch 4.x-HBase-1.1. It's pom version is
> > 4.5.0-HBase-1.1-SNAPSHOT. Was this pushed in error?
> >
> > -n
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1

Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Already deleted, but thanks anyway, Nick.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I believe the restriction has been released. I'll delete this branch
> tomorrow unless someone says otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:03 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the update, Ram. Would you mind following up with INFRA to get
>> a
>> more definitive answer?
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S <
>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > They have closed INFRA-10920 and pointed me to
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10800.  But there also
>> there
>> > is no conclusion on it and I think the ETA for deleting a branch is not
>> yet
>> > finalized. I am not aware of the background as why it was stopped.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Ram
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *From:* James Taylor [mailto:jamestaylor@apache.org
>> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jamestaylor@apache.org');>]
>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:52 AM
>> > *To:* dev@phoenix.apache.org
>> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@phoenix.apache.org');>; Vasudevan,
>> > Ramkrishna S
>> > *Subject:* Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, that was pushed in error.  INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it, but
>> > now it's closed with a link to another JIRA that links more JIRAs - it's
>> > unclear what the resolution is.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ram - would you mind following up on that?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > James
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
>> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ndimiduk@apache.org');>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Heya,
>> >
>> > I see we now have a branch 4.x-HBase-1.1. It's pom version is
>> > 4.5.0-HBase-1.1-SNAPSHOT. Was this pushed in error?
>> >
>> > -n
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>