You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> on 2009/02/03 19:27:47 UTC
Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release
Geir, any updates on getting item (iii) below removed, so we can release
the early spec implementation and a OpenJPA 2.0.0 M1 release?
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Any updates on item (iii)? Can we just include the notice for EA-1
>> and revisit for the next release?
>
> My interpretation of Geir's response is that we can't distribute stuff
> with this restriction, so no, we have to wait until the conditions are
> changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>> Looks like a problem.
>>> I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii).
>>> I'll work on setting up a new release candidate.
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
>>>> David,
>>>>
>>>> While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early
>>>> access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the clauses
>>>> below, notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added to the
>>>> NOTICE in the EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE use "JPA
>>>> 2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to meet
>>>> clause ii?
>>>> <jsr-317 draft>
>>>> NOTICE
>>>> ...
>>>> 2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties
>>>> for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such
>>>> implementation:
>>>> (i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the
>>>> Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages,
>>>> classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor Name
>>>> Space other than those required/authorized by the Specification or
>>>> Specifications being implemented;
>>>> (ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or
>>>> "EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
>>>> or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in
>>>> proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or
>>>> link is under Licensee's control; and
>>>> (iii)includes the following notice:
>>>> "This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed
>>>> under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for
>>>> testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not compatible
>>>> with any specification of the JCP."
>>>> </jsr-317 draft>
>>>>
>>>> -Jeremy
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks
>>>> <david_jencks@yahoo.com <ma...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
>>>> spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first
>>>> early access milestone release.
>>>>
>>>> I've staged the release here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The svn location is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a
>>>> early access release, but will reconsider on request.
>>>>
>>>> I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
>>>> files are ok.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Any replies from Sun on this?
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Geir, any updates on getting item (iii) below removed, so we can release
> the early spec implementation and a OpenJPA 2.0.0 M1 release?
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Any updates on item (iii)? Can we just include the notice for EA-1
>>> and revisit for the next release?
>>
>> My interpretation of Geir's response is that we can't distribute stuff
>> with this restriction, so no, we have to wait until the conditions are
>> changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>> Looks like a problem.
>>>> I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii).
>>>> I'll work on setting up a new release candidate.
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early
>>>>> access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the
>>>>> clauses below, notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added
>>>>> to the NOTICE in the EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE
>>>>> use "JPA 2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to
>>>>> meet clause ii?
>>>>> <jsr-317 draft>
>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties
>>>>> for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such
>>>>> implementation:
>>>>> (i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the
>>>>> Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages,
>>>>> classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor
>>>>> Name Space other than those required/authorized by the
>>>>> Specification or Specifications being implemented;
>>>>> (ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or
>>>>> "EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
>>>>> or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in
>>>>> proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or
>>>>> link is under Licensee's control; and
>>>>> (iii)includes the following notice:
>>>>> "This is an implementation of an early-draft specification
>>>>> developed under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made
>>>>> available for testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not
>>>>> compatible with any specification of the JCP."
>>>>> </jsr-317 draft>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jeremy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks
>>>>> <david_jencks@yahoo.com <ma...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
>>>>> spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first
>>>>> early access milestone release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've staged the release here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The svn location is here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a
>>>>> early access release, but will reconsider on request.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
>>>>> files are ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Any replies from Sun on this?
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Geir, any updates on getting item (iii) below removed, so we can release
> the early spec implementation and a OpenJPA 2.0.0 M1 release?
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Any updates on item (iii)? Can we just include the notice for EA-1
>>> and revisit for the next release?
>>
>> My interpretation of Geir's response is that we can't distribute stuff
>> with this restriction, so no, we have to wait until the conditions are
>> changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>> Looks like a problem.
>>>> I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii).
>>>> I'll work on setting up a new release candidate.
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early
>>>>> access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the
>>>>> clauses below, notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added
>>>>> to the NOTICE in the EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE
>>>>> use "JPA 2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to
>>>>> meet clause ii?
>>>>> <jsr-317 draft>
>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties
>>>>> for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such
>>>>> implementation:
>>>>> (i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the
>>>>> Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages,
>>>>> classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor
>>>>> Name Space other than those required/authorized by the
>>>>> Specification or Specifications being implemented;
>>>>> (ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or
>>>>> "EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
>>>>> or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in
>>>>> proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or
>>>>> link is under Licensee's control; and
>>>>> (iii)includes the following notice:
>>>>> "This is an implementation of an early-draft specification
>>>>> developed under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made
>>>>> available for testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not
>>>>> compatible with any specification of the JCP."
>>>>> </jsr-317 draft>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jeremy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks
>>>>> <david_jencks@yahoo.com <ma...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
>>>>> spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first
>>>>> early access milestone release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've staged the release here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The svn location is here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a
>>>>> early access release, but will reconsider on request.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
>>>>> files are ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>