You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2023/01/12 15:30:26 UTC

@Inject in wicket-10

Hello All,

Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced
with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?

Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
results in 14 files")

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Thanks :)

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:56, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:51 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The only place I was to find is
> >
> > org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.ListContacts;
> >
>
> Arqillian is not supported since a long time. It is not member of the Maven
> reactor.
>
>
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:47, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:43 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do we use/support it?!
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Do it!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be
> > replaced
> > > > > > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> > > > > > results in 14 files")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Maxim
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Maxim
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:51 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The only place I was to find is
>
> org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.ListContacts;
>

Arqillian is not supported since a long time. It is not member of the Maven
reactor.


> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:47, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:43 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ?
> > >
> >
> > Do we use/support it?!
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do it!
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be
> replaced
> > > > > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
> > > > >
> > > > > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> > > > > results in 14 files")
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Maxim
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Maxim
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

The only place I was to find is

org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.ListContacts;

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:47, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:43 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ?
> >
>
> Do we use/support it?!
>
>
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Do it!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced
> > > > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
> > > >
> > > > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> > > > results in 14 files")
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Maxim
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:43 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ?
>

Do we use/support it?!


> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Do it!
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced
> > > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
> > >
> > > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> > > results in 14 files")
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Maxim
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ?

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Do it!
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced
> > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
> >
> > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> > results in 14 files")
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Do it!

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced
> with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"?
>
> Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17
> results in 14 files")
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>