You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@abdera.apache.org by Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com> on 2007/10/15 03:09:45 UTC

Make RequestContext properties more flexible?

How would people feel about making the RequesstContext properties more 
flexible? Instead of an enumeration of keys, it'd be nice of the 
RequestContext was more hashmap like and we could set arbitrary 
properties. RequestContext could extend Map<String,Object> or add 
set/removeProperty() methods. Then I could shove anything in there that 
I want and only have to pass the RequestContext around :-)

- Dan

-- 
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: Make RequestContext properties more flexible?

Posted by James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com>.

Damn I'm good... I just *knew* you were going to ask for that ;-)

Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>> How would people feel about making the RequesstContext properties more
>> flexible? Instead of an enumeration of keys, it'd be nice of the
>> RequestContext was more hashmap like and we could set arbitrary
>> properties. RequestContext could extend Map<String,Object> or add
>> set/removeProperty() methods. Then I could shove anything in there
>> that I want and only have to pass the RequestContext around :-)
>>
>> - Dan
>>
> Wait, right after I hit send I saw setAttribute and that is what I need.
> Nevermind...
> 
> - Dan
>

Re: Make RequestContext properties more flexible?

Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com>.

Dan Diephouse wrote:
> How would people feel about making the RequesstContext properties more 
> flexible? Instead of an enumeration of keys, it'd be nice of the 
> RequestContext was more hashmap like and we could set arbitrary 
> properties. RequestContext could extend Map<String,Object> or add 
> set/removeProperty() methods. Then I could shove anything in there 
> that I want and only have to pass the RequestContext around :-)
>
> - Dan
>
Wait, right after I hit send I saw setAttribute and that is what I need. 
Nevermind...

- Dan

-- 
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog