Problem related to spamcop.

["Steven W. Orr" <st...@syslang.net>]

All of sudden, my ability to report email to spamcop has been impacted. 
I'm not doing anything differently.

I read my mail using alpine and I pipe my spam through the following 
script:

exec tee >(mail submit.myspamcopaddr@spam.spamcop.net) | sa-learn --spam

As of this morning I get the reports sent back to me saying. Is spamcop 
dead or am I doing somthing wrong?

Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:01:19 GMT
From: SpamCop AutoResponder <sp...@devnull.spamcop.net>
To: steveo@syslang.net
Subject: [SpamCop] Errors encountered

SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing:
SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email:

Return-Path: <st...@syslang.net>
Received: from sc-smtp2-bulkmx.soma.ironport.com
(sc-smtp2-bulkmx.soma.ironport.com [204.15.82.125])
         by sc-app5.soma.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15613D471D6
         for <su...@spam.spamcop.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008
05:58:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Fozzie-Original-To: submit.myspamcopaddr@spam.spamcop.net
Received: from saturn.syslang.net ([207.172.210.41])
   by vmx2.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2008 05:58:32 -0800
Received: from saturn.syslang.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
         by saturn.syslang.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1QDwUFF017208
         for <su...@spam.spamcop.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008
08:58:31 -0500
Received: (from steveo@localhost)
         by saturn.syslang.net (8.13.8/8.13.7/Submit) id m1QDwU7f017204
         for submit.myspamcopaddr@spam.spamcop.net; Tue, 26 Feb 2008
08:58:30 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:58:30 -0500
From: steveo@syslang.net
Message-Id: <20...@saturn.syslang.net>
To: submit.myspamcopaddr@spam.spamcop.net
Return-Path: <hr...@rfkmemorial.org>
Received: from rfkmemorial.org (acgg9.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.9.234.9])
         by saturn.syslang.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m1Q6vI3R000999
         for <st...@syslang.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:57:20 -0500
Received: from rfkmemorial.org.s5a1.psmtp.com
         by 83.9.234.9 (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id Hp9aqaRMN2Lg
         for <st...@syslang.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:49:17 +0100
Received: from passamon ([213.150.210.8])
         by rfkmemorial.org.s5a1.psmtp.com with ESMTP (Exim 4.05) id
WgMmFU3SsDQp
         for <st...@syslang.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:49:17 +0100
From: "Pearlie Warner" <hr...@rfkmemorial.org>
Reply-To: "Pearlie Warner" <hr...@rfkmemorial.org>
Message-ID: <24...@rfkmemorial.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:49:17 +0100
To: <st...@syslang.net>
Subject: Pornstar calli cox anal fucked inobvious
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_PBL,
         RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_XBL autolearn=no version=3.2.4
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on 
saturn.syslang.net



-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

Re: Problem related to spamcop.

[Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi>]

> All of sudden, my ability to report email to spamcop has
> been impacted. I'm not doing anything differently.
> 
> I read my mail using alpine and I pipe my spam through
> the following script:
> 
> exec tee >(mail submit.myspamcopaddr@spam.spamcop.net) |
> sa-learn --spam 
> 
> As of this morning I get the reports sent back to me
> saying. Is spamcop dead or am I doing somthing wrong?
> 
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:01:19 GMT
> From: SpamCop AutoResponder <sp...@devnull.spamcop.net>
> To: steveo@syslang.net
> Subject: [SpamCop] Errors encountered
> 
> SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for
> processing: 
> SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email:
> 

SpamCop needs the spam sent to them as an attachment. Your sample had no attachment, but the spam itself as the sent mail.

So it looks to me.