You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/07 22:22:14 UTC

problem generated project files with mvn in 1.x

anyone else seeing this?

http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/4925

-igor

Re: problem generated project files with mvn in 1.x

Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 3/9/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i used Command prompts when i was young thats sort of not the case anymore

I already reserved you a place in the retirement home, they only
didn't accept your TV, so you'd rather give that one to me :-)

Martijn

-- 
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Re: problem generated project files with mvn in 1.x

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
I have pretty much the same feeling but i will see how the new project
structure
will look like and how easy it is to use that.
It should be really dead simple

I still think that pom files should be generated by eclipse and not the
other way around... :)
Because then i can do the editting true nice point and click. I don't like
command line and
i don't like editing txt/xml files.. That should the tool do not me.
i used Command prompts when i was young thats sort of not the case anymore
:(

johan


On 3/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The brilliance of removing the Eclipse project files from svn still
> escapes me. We had a great setup where projects did have the correct
> JDK profile, as long as everyone obeyed the rules. Now we have *ALL*
> to fight the bugs in the maven eclipse plugin to do something basic
> that only one person has to do.
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On 3/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@knopp.sk> wrote:
> > nope. I've just checked out entire 1.x brach today and built it
> > according to this
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT
> >
> > and everything worked fine.
> >
> > (i had to run eclipse:eclipse twice, first with -Pjdk1.4 and for java 5
> > projects with -Pjdk1.5).
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > anyone else seeing this?
> > >
> > > http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/4925
> > >
> > > -igor
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>

Re: problem generated project files with mvn in 1.x

Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
The brilliance of removing the Eclipse project files from svn still
escapes me. We had a great setup where projects did have the correct
JDK profile, as long as everyone obeyed the rules. Now we have *ALL*
to fight the bugs in the maven eclipse plugin to do something basic
that only one person has to do.

Martijn


On 3/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@knopp.sk> wrote:
> nope. I've just checked out entire 1.x brach today and built it
> according to this
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT
>
> and everything worked fine.
>
> (i had to run eclipse:eclipse twice, first with -Pjdk1.4 and for java 5
> projects with -Pjdk1.5).
>
> -Matej
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/4925
> >
> > -igor
> >
>
>


-- 
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Re: problem generated project files with mvn in 1.x

Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@knopp.sk>.
nope. I've just checked out entire 1.x brach today and built it 
according to this
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT

and everything worked fine.

(i had to run eclipse:eclipse twice, first with -Pjdk1.4 and for java 5 
projects with -Pjdk1.5).

-Matej

Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> anyone else seeing this?
> 
> http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/4925
> 
> -igor
>