You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com> on 2009/02/17 08:26:20 UTC
WicketURLEncoder.QUERY_INSTANCE result not (even near) same as
java.net.URLEncoder?
Hi!
The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
the compatibility of QUERY_INSTANCE and java.net.URLEncoder.
However, the results differ significantly. Specifically the
"dontNeedEncoding" characters. We had a bit of a surprise integrating
our app with another app expecting more strict encoding.
Does this difference remain intentional?
**
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketURLEncoder.QUERY_INSTANCE result not (even near) same as
java.net.URLEncoder?
Posted by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com>.
Then maybe java.net.URLEncoder is more strict than the 'spec'... ok.
**
Martin
2009/2/17 Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>:
> as far as i know it does follow the spec specially for query portion and the
> path portions.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:26, Martin Makundi <
> martin.makundi@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
>> the compatibility of QUERY_INSTANCE and java.net.URLEncoder.
>>
>> However, the results differ significantly. Specifically the
>> "dontNeedEncoding" characters. We had a bit of a surprise integrating
>> our app with another app expecting more strict encoding.
>>
>> Does this difference remain intentional?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketURLEncoder.QUERY_INSTANCE result not (even near) same as
java.net.URLEncoder?
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
as far as i know it does follow the spec specially for query portion and the
path portions.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:26, Martin Makundi <
martin.makundi@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
> the compatibility of QUERY_INSTANCE and java.net.URLEncoder.
>
> However, the results differ significantly. Specifically the
> "dontNeedEncoding" characters. We had a bit of a surprise integrating
> our app with another app expecting more strict encoding.
>
> Does this difference remain intentional?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>