You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/14 04:09:47 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3405) FairScheduler's preemption cannot
happen between sibling in some case
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14742798#comment-14742798 ]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3405:
---------------------------------
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch | 0m 0s | The patch command could not apply the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12727554/YARN-3405.02.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / 332b520 |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/9109/console |
This message was automatically generated.
> FairScheduler's preemption cannot happen between sibling in some case
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3405
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3405
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
> Affects Versions: 2.7.0
> Reporter: Peng Zhang
> Assignee: Peng Zhang
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
> Attachments: YARN-3405.01.patch, YARN-3405.02.patch
>
>
> Queue hierarchy described as below:
> {noformat}
> root
> / \
> queue-1 queue-2
> / \
> queue-1-1 queue-1-2
> {noformat}
> Assume cluster resource is 100
> # queue-1-1 and queue-2 has app. Each get 50 usage and 50 fairshare.
> # When queue-1-2 is active, and it cause some new preemption request for fairshare 25.
> # When preemption from root, it has possibility to find preemption candidate is queue-2. If so preemptContainerPreCheck for queue-2 return false because it's equal to its fairshare.
> # Finally queue-1-2 will be waiting for resource release form queue-1-1 itself.
> What I expect here is that queue-1-2 preempt from queue-1-1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)