You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by "Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/08/07 09:46:52 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-638) Two bookies could start at the same time to access bookie data.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Flavio Junqueira updated BOOKKEEPER-638:
----------------------------------------

    Assignee: Sijie Guo
    
> Two bookies could start at the same time to access bookie data.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-638
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: bookkeeper-server
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>            Reporter: Sijie Guo
>            Assignee: Sijie Guo
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>         Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-638.diff
>
>
> this issue is introduced in providing netty server for bookie.
> in BOOKKEEPER-294, we agreed on the start sequence of bookie:
> 1) bind bookie port first (to avoid two processes running at the same host).
> 2) start bookie (e.g initialize bookie storage and replaying journals)
> 3) start nio server to accept incoming requests.
> but after refactoring for netty server, step 1) is combined to be executed in step 3), so two processes could have chance to run at the same time replaying journals. this is pretty bad.
> we need to change the code to stick on the sequence described above.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira