You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2008/03/04 18:40:45 UTC
[VOTE] new release process docs
The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were subject
to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
28updated%29+release+process
I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
[ ] +1 these are better
[ ] + 0 I could care less
[ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
thanks
david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
+1
++Vamsi
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:10 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were subject
> to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
> 28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
> needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Here's my +1
david jencks
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were
> subject to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
> 28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
> needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
+1
Joe
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
> also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
+1
David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
> needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:58 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Huh? Click edit on the page, then "remove page" in the top right-
> ish bits. That should nuke it from confluence... is that what you
> meant?
Yup, thanks!
david jencks
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:48 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I managed to move the new page and point to it instead of the old
>> page but I have no idea how to remove the old page.
>>
>> Help??
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> This vote passes with 12 +1 votes, some comments by jdillon and
>>> no other votes.
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can figure out how to move the pages in confluence
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/
>>>> confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate
>>>> they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
>>>> needs a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>>>>
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
>>>> 28updated%29+release+process
>>>>
>>>> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for
>>>> clarifications, updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>>>>
>>>> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 these are better
>>>> [ ] + 0 I could care less
>>>> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Huh? Click edit on the page, then "remove page" in the top right-ish
bits. That should nuke it from confluence... is that what you meant?
--jason
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:48 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I managed to move the new page and point to it instead of the old
> page but I have no idea how to remove the old page.
>
> Help??
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> This vote passes with 12 +1 votes, some comments by jdillon and no
>> other votes.
>>
>> I'll see if I can figure out how to move the pages in confluence
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
>>> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
>>> also needs a vote.
>>>
>>> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>>>
>>> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
>>> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>>>
>>> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 these are better
>>> [ ] + 0 I could care less
>>> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I managed to move the new page and point to it instead of the old
page but I have no idea how to remove the old page.
Help??
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> This vote passes with 12 +1 votes, some comments by jdillon and no
> other votes.
>
> I'll see if I can figure out how to move the pages in confluence
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/
>> confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate
>> they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also needs
>> a vote.
>>
>> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
>> 28updated%29+release+process
>>
>> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
>> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>>
>> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>>
>> [ ] +1 these are better
>> [ ] + 0 I could care less
>> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
This vote passes with 12 +1 votes, some comments by jdillon and no
other votes.
I'll see if I can figure out how to move the pages in confluence
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were
> subject to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
> 28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 05/03/2008, at 4:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were
> subject to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
> 28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
> needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +1 if you can also add a note about mvn release:rollback if the
> vote fails.
done, thanks!
david jencks
>
> Jarek
>
> On 3/4/08, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
>> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were
>> subject
>> to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>>
>> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
>> 28updated%29+release+process
>>
>> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
>> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>>
>> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>>
>> [ ] +1 these are better
>> [ ] + 0 I could care less
>> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> david jencks
>>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1 if you can also add a note about mvn release:rollback if the vote fails.
Jarek
On 3/4/08, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process indicate they were subject
> to a vote, so I think a major change also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%
> 28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
>
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
+1
David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change also
> needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 4, 2008, at 12:40 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
> also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
+1
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
+1. Looks great.
-David
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
> also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Um, I'm trying to grok this stuff... so is this going to be obsolete
then:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
in favor of what is in here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
?
I'm a bit overwhelmed by the sheer size of the new page in terms of
words I have to read to make sense out of what is proposed... so I
need another cup of coffee and then I'll comment further.
--jason
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
> also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
Re: [VOTE] new release process docs
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Does the stage copy/deploly actually work now?
--jason
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The current release process docs http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Release+Branching+Process
> indicate they were subject to a vote, so I think a major change
> also needs a vote.
>
> Please vote on changing to the proposed docs
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>
> I've added a note indicating that the idea is for clarifications,
> updates, etc to be fine without a vote.
>
> We'll finish up the vote friday morning March 7.
>
> [ ] +1 these are better
> [ ] + 0 I could care less
> [ ] -1 not exactly an improvement because....
>
> thanks
> david jencks