You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@reef.apache.org by Dongjoon Hyun <do...@apache.org> on 2016/06/08 00:29:29 UTC
Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Hi All.
In our homepage, all old docs seems to be deleted sadly at the last commit.
Only 0.14.0 is there.
http://reef.apache.org/apidocs/0.13.0-incubating/index.html
...
http://reef.apache.org/apidocs/0.11.0-incubating/index.html
...
Homepage SVN log looks like this.
reef$ svn log | head -n 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1736522 | yunseong | 2016-03-24 18:23:51 -0700 (Thu, 24 Mar 2016) | 1 line
reef$ svn diff -c r1736522 --summarize
M site/source-repository.html
M site/talks.html
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/deprecated-list.html
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/allclasses-noframe.html
...
I can recover all of them, but is it worth for recovering?
What about keeping 0.14 and new 0.15?
Actually, since 0.14, we have both Java and .Net documents.
Warmly,
Dongjoon.
Re: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Posted by Markus Weimer <ma...@weimo.de>.
> 0.10.0-incubating ~ 0.13.0-incubating documents are recovered, and
> 0.15.0 (Java/.Net) documentations are loaded, too.
Thanks!
Markus
Re: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Posted by Dongjoon Hyun <do...@apache.org>.
FYI,
0.10.0-incubating ~ 0.13.0-incubating documents are recovered, and
0.15.0 (Java/.Net) documentations are loaded, too.
Dongjoon.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <do...@apache.org> wrote:
> No problem for recovering. :)
>
> It's not about traffic issue.
>
> But, I think I have not enough time to investigate the reason.
>
> I'll recover all of them and just add 0.15 then.
>
> Dongjoon.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Mariia Mykhailova <ma...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is it REEF-885 again?
>>
>> I think we need to recover old apidocs and try to figure out why they are
>> disappearing. I'm reasonably sure REEF 0.13 is still in use somewhere. And
>> while our Java apidoc might not get heavy traffic (or this would have been
>> noticed and reported before), I feel that graduated Apache projects should
>> not delete their apidocs two versions back, especially by accident.
>>
>> -Mariia
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dongjoon Hyun [mailto:dongjoon@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 5:29 PM
>> To: dev@reef.apache.org
>> Subject: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
>>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> In our homepage, all old docs seems to be deleted sadly at the last
>> commit.
>> Only 0.14.0 is there.
>>
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.13.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=WFlWKZ5JSwiKtvzderHKL3ClW4nKvvWgHyoo2zvJq5g%3d
>> ...
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.11.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=LhqkSQXsVHUWfU%2bV7YU%2bHGRnc4ymus4RSpFj4DXpooY%3d
>> ...
>>
>> Homepage SVN log looks like this.
>>
>> reef$ svn log | head -n 2
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r1736522 | yunseong | 2016-03-24 18:23:51 -0700 (Thu, 24 Mar 2016) | 1
>> line
>>
>> reef$ svn diff -c r1736522 --summarize
>> M site/source-repository.html
>> M site/talks.html
>> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating
>> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/deprecated-list.html
>> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/allclasses-noframe.html
>> ...
>>
>> I can recover all of them, but is it worth for recovering?
>> What about keeping 0.14 and new 0.15?
>> Actually, since 0.14, we have both Java and .Net documents.
>>
>> Warmly,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>
>
Re: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Posted by Dongjoon Hyun <do...@apache.org>.
No problem for recovering. :)
It's not about traffic issue.
But, I think I have not enough time to investigate the reason.
I'll recover all of them and just add 0.15 then.
Dongjoon.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Mariia Mykhailova <ma...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Is it REEF-885 again?
>
> I think we need to recover old apidocs and try to figure out why they are
> disappearing. I'm reasonably sure REEF 0.13 is still in use somewhere. And
> while our Java apidoc might not get heavy traffic (or this would have been
> noticed and reported before), I feel that graduated Apache projects should
> not delete their apidocs two versions back, especially by accident.
>
> -Mariia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dongjoon Hyun [mailto:dongjoon@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 5:29 PM
> To: dev@reef.apache.org
> Subject: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
>
> Hi All.
>
> In our homepage, all old docs seems to be deleted sadly at the last commit.
> Only 0.14.0 is there.
>
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.13.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=WFlWKZ5JSwiKtvzderHKL3ClW4nKvvWgHyoo2zvJq5g%3d
> ...
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.11.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=LhqkSQXsVHUWfU%2bV7YU%2bHGRnc4ymus4RSpFj4DXpooY%3d
> ...
>
> Homepage SVN log looks like this.
>
> reef$ svn log | head -n 2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r1736522 | yunseong | 2016-03-24 18:23:51 -0700 (Thu, 24 Mar 2016) | 1 line
>
> reef$ svn diff -c r1736522 --summarize
> M site/source-repository.html
> M site/talks.html
> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating
> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/deprecated-list.html
> D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/allclasses-noframe.html
> ...
>
> I can recover all of them, but is it worth for recovering?
> What about keeping 0.14 and new 0.15?
> Actually, since 0.14, we have both Java and .Net documents.
>
> Warmly,
> Dongjoon.
>
RE: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Posted by Mariia Mykhailova <ma...@microsoft.com>.
Is it REEF-885 again?
I think we need to recover old apidocs and try to figure out why they are disappearing. I'm reasonably sure REEF 0.13 is still in use somewhere. And while our Java apidoc might not get heavy traffic (or this would have been noticed and reported before), I feel that graduated Apache projects should not delete their apidocs two versions back, especially by accident.
-Mariia
-----Original Message-----
From: Dongjoon Hyun [mailto:dongjoon@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 5:29 PM
To: dev@reef.apache.org
Subject: Missing old API documents on REEF homepage.
Hi All.
In our homepage, all old docs seems to be deleted sadly at the last commit.
Only 0.14.0 is there.
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.13.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=WFlWKZ5JSwiKtvzderHKL3ClW4nKvvWgHyoo2zvJq5g%3d
...
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2freef.apache.org%2fapidocs%2f0.11.0-incubating%2findex.html&data=01%7c01%7cmamykhai%40microsoft.com%7c12f42e17150c4725ca4608d38f33f584%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=LhqkSQXsVHUWfU%2bV7YU%2bHGRnc4ymus4RSpFj4DXpooY%3d
...
Homepage SVN log looks like this.
reef$ svn log | head -n 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1736522 | yunseong | 2016-03-24 18:23:51 -0700 (Thu, 24 Mar 2016) | 1 line
reef$ svn diff -c r1736522 --summarize
M site/source-repository.html
M site/talks.html
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/deprecated-list.html
D site/apidocs/0.12.0-incubating/allclasses-noframe.html
...
I can recover all of them, but is it worth for recovering?
What about keeping 0.14 and new 0.15?
Actually, since 0.14, we have both Java and .Net documents.
Warmly,
Dongjoon.