You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Timo Walther (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/07 15:31:22 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FLINK-4592) Fix flaky test
ScalarFunctionsTest.testCurrentTimePoint
Timo Walther created FLINK-4592:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Fix flaky test ScalarFunctionsTest.testCurrentTimePoint
Key: FLINK-4592
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4592
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Table API & SQL
Reporter: Timo Walther
It seems that the test is still non deterministic.
{code}
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.ScalarFunctionsTest
testCurrentTimePoint(org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.ScalarFunctionsTest) Time elapsed: 0.083 sec <<< FAILURE!
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Wrong result for: AS(>=(CHAR_LENGTH(CAST(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP):VARCHAR(1) CHARACTER SET "ISO-8859-1" COLLATE "ISO-8859-1$en_US$primary" NOT NULL), 22), '_c0') expected:<[tru]e> but was:<[fals]e>
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:115)
at org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase$$anonfun$evaluateExprs$1.apply(ExpressionTestBase.scala:126)
at org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase$$anonfun$evaluateExprs$1.apply(ExpressionTestBase.scala:123)
at scala.collection.mutable.LinkedHashSet.foreach(LinkedHashSet.scala:87)
at org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase.evaluateExprs(ExpressionTestBase.scala:123)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor6.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:33)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)