You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/02 16:51:56 UTC
Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Other than a volunteer, is there anything holding up the promotion of subForm?
I went through the issue tracker and created a subForm component
category and moved relevent issues into it.
I only see one open issue for subForm, and I don't consider it a
blocker to promotion:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
It has documentation:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
It has an example:
http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20070301/subForm.jsf
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
is there a test case ?
On 3/2/07, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than a volunteer, is there anything holding up the promotion of subForm?
>
> I went through the issue tracker and created a subForm component
> category and moved relevent issues into it.
>
> I only see one open issue for subForm, and I don't consider it a
> blocker to promotion:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>
> It has documentation:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>
> It has an example:
>
> http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20070301/subForm.jsf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I also think, like Werner that the validators/converters are good
candidates for a promotion.
The myfaces-commons... well... matter of time, isn't it ?
-M
On 3/6/07, Volker Weber <v....@inexso.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, the myfaces-commons subproject is still missing.
> IMHO Converters, Validators, and other non rendering stuff should not
> go into tomahawk.
>
> Regards,
>
> Volker
>
> 2007/3/6, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>:
> > Werner Punz schrieb:
> > > +1 as well...
> > >
> > >
> > Btw. is there a reason which holds back the promotion of
> > all the converters in the sandbox?
> >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Volker Weber <v....@inexso.de>.
Hi!
Yes, the myfaces-commons subproject is still missing.
IMHO Converters, Validators, and other non rendering stuff should not
go into tomahawk.
Regards,
Volker
2007/3/6, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>:
> Werner Punz schrieb:
> > +1 as well...
> >
> >
> Btw. is there a reason which holds back the promotion of
> all the converters in the sandbox?
>
>
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>.
Werner Punz schrieb:
> +1 as well...
>
>
Btw. is there a reason which holds back the promotion of
all the converters in the sandbox?
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>.
+1 as well...
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> my +1 for promoting this comp up to tomahawk. It's very useful, and I
> use it in several production level apps. I have never had any issues
> with its javascript either, but I don't have time to try to reproduce
> the bug.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 3/2/07, Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com> wrote:
>> Does that bug even still exist?
>>
>> I'm using subForm successfully in app that is nearing production. :D
>>
>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > Other than a volunteer, is there anything holding up the promotion of
>> > subForm?
>> >
>> > I went through the issue tracker and created a subForm component
>> > category and moved relevent issues into it.
>> >
>> > I only see one open issue for subForm, and I don't consider it a
>> > blocker to promotion:
>> >
>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>> >
>> > It has documentation:
>> >
>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>> >
>> > It has an example:
>> >
>> > http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20070301/subForm.jsf
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
my +1 for promoting this comp up to tomahawk. It's very useful, and I
use it in several production level apps. I have never had any issues
with its javascript either, but I don't have time to try to reproduce
the bug.
regards,
Martin
On 3/2/07, Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com> wrote:
> Does that bug even still exist?
>
> I'm using subForm successfully in app that is nearing production. :D
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > Other than a volunteer, is there anything holding up the promotion of
> > subForm?
> >
> > I went through the issue tracker and created a subForm component
> > category and moved relevent issues into it.
> >
> > I only see one open issue for subForm, and I don't consider it a
> > blocker to promotion:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
> >
> > It has documentation:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
> >
> > It has an example:
> >
> > http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20070301/subForm.jsf
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: Status of subForm: time for promotion?
Posted by Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com>.
Does that bug even still exist?
I'm using subForm successfully in app that is nearing production. :D
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Other than a volunteer, is there anything holding up the promotion of
> subForm?
>
> I went through the issue tracker and created a subForm component
> category and moved relevent issues into it.
>
> I only see one open issue for subForm, and I don't consider it a
> blocker to promotion:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>
> It has documentation:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-445
>
> It has an example:
>
> http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20070301/subForm.jsf
>
>
>