You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com> on 2015/10/05 12:38:33 UTC

Re: Next release?

I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.

We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?

Thanks,
Jesús



On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:

>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>
>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>> feel about all this?
>>
>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>
>>
>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>
>>>Here are some dates:
>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>to complete?
>>>
>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>
>>>Julian
>>>
>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>
>>
>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
I have just pushed a new SNAPSHOT based on git commit f5f83e5df2ada64bfc211952f2f273619d94d3ae.

I created HIVE-12186 to track the upgrade to 1.5 in Hive. Waiting for QA results; I will update the thread shortly.

Thanks,
Jesús



On 10/14/15, 11:28 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as someone who knows how Maven works.
>
>Thanks!
>
>I always thought it ironic that they called it “maven”, considering you need to be an expert to use it.
>
>Julian
>
>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as someone who knows how Maven works.

Thanks!

I always thought it ironic that they called it “maven”, considering you need to be an expert to use it.

Julian

Re: Next release?

Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.

Julian Hyde wrote:
> We're getting close to our first RC. Time for a status update.
>
> I have checked in 785 and 910; 816 is the remaining big issue on my plate.
>
> Has anyone tested against the snapshot? What did you find?
>
> Jacques raised an issue last release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-861 "Fix or document
> issue where first time user cannot use mvn compile". I think we need
> to fix it before the release. Can someone investigate?

I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as 
someone who knows how Maven works.

> Jesus, What's your perspective on the state of the release?
>
> Julian
>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
We're getting close to our first RC. Time for a status update.

I have checked in 785 and 910; 816 is the remaining big issue on my plate.

Has anyone tested against the snapshot? What did you find?

Jacques raised an issue last release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-861 "Fix or document
issue where first time user cannot use mvn compile". I think we need
to fix it before the release. Can someone investigate?

Jesus, What's your perspective on the state of the release?

Julian


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
> then 816 in a few days.
>
> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>
> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
> snapshot anytime you like.
>
> Julian
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
> MULTISET support
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>
>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>
>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>
>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>>Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
Sure, let's proceed that way then, and release after graduation.

As Julian suggested, I've pushed a 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT to the Apache Snapshot Repo. Please try out this branch and report back whether you see any showstopping regressions.

You can test it by adding the following maven snapshot repository to your pom.xml:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/

The version of the artifacts to reference is 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT. The artifacts are currently based on git commit 126a5e3c7317be0b0fb94568c6b6c5434fbf9e2c.

Thanks,
Jesús




On 10/5/15, 8:29 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:

>I agree with Jacques: we should release after graduation.
>
>But I think we should get a release ready before graduation, including
>snapshots, stabilization, release candidates and an informal vote for
>a release candidate. All being well, we can start a formal vote as a
>top-level PMC on Oct 22nd, the day after the Board meeting.
>
>Jesus goes on vacation soon after that, so but we basically will have
>the release in the bag by then.
>
>Julian
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
>> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
>> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
>> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
>> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
>> then 816 in a few days.
>>
>> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
>> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
>> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>>
>> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
>> snapshot anytime you like.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
>> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
>> MULTISET support
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>>
>>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>>
>>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I agree with Jacques: we should release after graduation.

But I think we should get a release ready before graduation, including
snapshots, stabilization, release candidates and an informal vote for
a release candidate. All being well, we can start a formal vote as a
top-level PMC on Oct 22nd, the day after the Board meeting.

Jesus goes on vacation soon after that, so but we basically will have
the release in the bag by then.

Julian


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
> then 816 in a few days.
>
> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>
> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
> snapshot anytime you like.
>
> Julian
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
> MULTISET support
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>
>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>
>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>
>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>>Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Re: Next release?

Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
then 816 in a few days.

That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.

I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
snapshot anytime you like.

Julian

* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
MULTISET support


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>
> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
>
> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>
>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>
>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>> feel about all this?
>>>
>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>
>>>
>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>
>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>to complete?
>>>>
>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>
>>>>Julian
>>>>
>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>
>>>
>>