You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> on 2008/09/02 22:02:05 UTC
Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Hi folks!
This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for a
while now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
Any objections? Opinions?
(Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
/Janne
Re: Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
now ok for me +1
dirk
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez
<ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 too
>
> 2008/9/3 Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> 2008/9/2 Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
>>
>> > Hi folks!
>> >
>> > This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
>> > considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for a
>> while
>> > now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
>> >
>> > Any objections? Opinions?
>> >
>> > (Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
>> >
>> > /Janne
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> met vriendelijke groet,
>> Harry Metske
>> Telnr. +31-548-512395
>> Mobile +31-6-51898081
>>
>
Re: Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
+1 too
2008/9/3 Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> +1
>
>
> 2008/9/2 Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
> > considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for a
> while
> > now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
> >
> > Any objections? Opinions?
> >
> > (Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
> >
> > /Janne
> >
>
>
>
> --
> met vriendelijke groet,
> Harry Metske
> Telnr. +31-548-512395
> Mobile +31-6-51898081
>
Re: Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
+1
2008/9/2 Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
> Hi folks!
>
> This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
> considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for a while
> now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
>
> Any objections? Opinions?
>
> (Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
>
> /Janne
>
--
met vriendelijke groet,
Harry Metske
Telnr. +31-548-512395
Mobile +31-6-51898081
Re: Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
allmost +1 : still closing 2 jira's probably by the weekend: 369, 370.
dirk
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andrew Jaquith <an...@me.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
>> considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for a while
>> now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
>>
>> Any objections? Opinions?
>>
>> (Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
>>
>> /Janne
>
Re: Is 2.8 ready for beta?
Posted by Andrew Jaquith <an...@me.com>.
+1
On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> This isn't an official vote, but looking at our open issues list and
> considering that I've been running 2.7.0-alpha-36 in production for
> a while now (with no ill effects), I think it's ready for a beta.
>
> Any objections? Opinions?
>
> (Beta means no new features, extensive testing, bug fixes only.)
>
> /Janne