You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Enrico Weigelt <we...@metux.de> on 2002/11/26 11:09:35 UTC
MPM perchild againg
hi folks,
it seems that under some circumstances the messages for connection
passing between childs are not received at the destination process.
sometimes it also happened, that apr_poll() returned w/o error,
but scan through the listener list does not find the touched socket.
perhaps there's a leak in the listener list. where could it be modified ?
should the pollset better be recreated before each poll ?
~-n
--
Bestes Mittel gegen Mailviren: Outlook löschen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux ITS
Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat. UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr.
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 smsgate: sms.weigelt@metux.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/
SV: MPM perchild againg
Posted by Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com>.
I'm usning
Revision 1.136
./configure --enable-so --prefix=/usr/local/apache2.0.43
--with-mpm=perchild
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Enrico Weigelt <we...@metux.de> wrote:
> it seems that under some circumstances the messages for connection
> passing between childs are not received at the destination process.
> sometimes it also happened, that apr_poll() returned w/o error,
> but scan through the listener list does not find the touched socket.
> perhaps there's a leak in the listener list. where could it be
modified ?
> should the pollset better be recreated before each poll ?
What version of the perchild MPM are you using?
There were some significant bugs earlier that I've fixed, but there's
still one significant bug that prevents perchild from being useful.
JE
Re: MPM perchild againg
Posted by Johannes Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com>.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Enrico Weigelt <we...@metux.de> wrote:
> it seems that under some circumstances the messages for connection
> passing between childs are not received at the destination process.
> sometimes it also happened, that apr_poll() returned w/o error,
> but scan through the listener list does not find the touched socket.
> perhaps there's a leak in the listener list. where could it be modified ?
> should the pollset better be recreated before each poll ?
What version of the perchild MPM are you using?
There were some significant bugs earlier that I've fixed, but there's
still one significant bug that prevents perchild from being useful.
JE