You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-cs@ibatis.apache.org by Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/08 08:15:11 UTC
[VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess 1.6.0 to
[BETA].
Here's my +1.
-Gilles
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Larry Meadors <la...@gmail.com>.
+1, even if you already have 3 votes!
Hey, so what if I am a Java guy..I am using iBATIS.net, too! :-)
Larry
On 6/8/05, Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are we voting on promoting the alpha to release -or- the alpha to beta?
>
>
> Since the alpha has been released there's been one or two little bug
> fixes and the checking of the sqlMap.config file against the schema can
> be bypassed. Its my understanding that even for very minor fixes like
> those we have to have another release cycle?
>
> +1 for the cs_release _01_06_2005 tag.
>
> --- Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Anyone who's tried the distribution and can attest to its quality
> > should vote.
> >
> > If the individual voting is a member of the iBATIS PMC, then the vote
> > is binding.
> >
> > We need three binding votes to call it a release.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 6/8/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
> > >
> > > Brandon
> > >
> > > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and
> > DataAccess 1.6.0 to
> > > > [BETA].
> > > > Here's my +1.
> > > >
> > > > -Gilles
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > HTH, Ted.
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1!
Roberto
On 6/8/05, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Anyone who's tried the distribution and can attest to its quality should
> vote.
>
> If the individual voting is a member of the iBATIS PMC, then the vote
> is binding.
>
> We need three binding votes to call it a release.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 6/8/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess
> 1.6.0 to
> > > [BETA].
> > > Here's my +1.
> > >
> > > -Gilles
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
>
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
The releases are immutable. We can include those in 1.2.1 but not in 1.2.0.
-Ted.
On 6/8/05, Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are we voting on promoting the alpha to release -or- the alpha to beta?
>
>
> Since the alpha has been released there's been one or two little bug
> fixes and the checking of the sqlMap.config file against the schema can
> be bypassed. Its my understanding that even for very minor fixes like
> those we have to have another release cycle?
>
> +1 for the cs_release _01_06_2005 tag.
>
> --- Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Anyone who's tried the distribution and can attest to its quality
> > should vote.
> >
> > If the individual voting is a member of the iBATIS PMC, then the vote
> > is binding.
> >
> > We need three binding votes to call it a release.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 6/8/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
> > >
> > > Brandon
> > >
> > > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and
> > DataAccess 1.6.0 to
> > > > [BETA].
> > > > Here's my +1.
> > > >
> > > > -Gilles
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > HTH, Ted.
> >
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>.
Are we voting on promoting the alpha to release -or- the alpha to beta?
Since the alpha has been released there's been one or two little bug
fixes and the checking of the sqlMap.config file against the schema can
be bypassed. Its my understanding that even for very minor fixes like
those we have to have another release cycle?
+1 for the cs_release _01_06_2005 tag.
--- Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Anyone who's tried the distribution and can attest to its quality
> should vote.
>
> If the individual voting is a member of the iBATIS PMC, then the vote
> is binding.
>
> We need three binding votes to call it a release.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 6/8/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and
> DataAccess 1.6.0 to
> > > [BETA].
> > > Here's my +1.
> > >
> > > -Gilles
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
>
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
+1
Anyone who's tried the distribution and can attest to its quality should vote.
If the individual voting is a member of the iBATIS PMC, then the vote
is binding.
We need three binding votes to call it a release.
-Ted.
On 6/8/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
>
> Brandon
>
> On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess 1.6.0 to
> > [BETA].
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > -Gilles
>
--
HTH, Ted.
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
should the ibatis java guys vote on this too?
Brandon
On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess 1.6.0 to
> [BETA].
> Here's my +1.
>
> -Gilles
Re: [VOTE] iBATIS DataMapper 1.2, DataAccess 1.6
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
We can just jump ahead and do a 1.2.1 distribution insead.
The process is meant to be light. We can roll the next distribution
whenever we want, and vote on its quality whenever we want.
We can vote on a distribution as soon as there is a distribution to
vote on, so if Gilles rolled a 1.2.1 tonight, we could vote on it
tonight, and have a 1.2.1 beta by morning.
If the releases were coming very close together, we could also skip
straight to General Availablility.
-Ted.
On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'am thinking passing this version from ALPHA to BETA and do a new BETA to
> support the new build and the new guide.
> I don't know if the BETA binaries can be different from the ALPHA binaries,
> if so we will do a new binaries fro BETA.
>
> If Ted can ask us what is the best to do ?
>
> On 6/8/05, Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Gilles.
> >
> > Sorry for the email, but does this vote just change the release status of
> the current ALPHA build to BETA (instead of creating a new build with the
> new DomSqlMapBuilder() constructor and DataMapper/DataAccess guide updates
> that is tagged as BETA?
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <ibatis.net@gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess
> 1.6.0 to [BETA].
> > > Here's my +1.
> > >
> > > -Gilles
> >
> >
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.