You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Marko Bauhardt <mb...@101tec.com> on 2009/01/28 09:45:44 UTC
Release 1.0?
Hi all,
is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
(9 Bugs).
Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
moved to version 1.1?
Thanks for response
Marko
Fwd: Release 1.0?
Posted by David Jashi <da...@jashi.ge>.
David Jashi wrote:
>
> > Wow. Does it mean we'll have live indexing out of the box?
> If by "live" you mean that you can index a fetched & parsed segment, and
have it appear
> immediately in live search after you commit, then yes. Other than that,
Nutch still uses
> segments as a unit of work, so the segment generation / fetch / parsing /
updatedb etc. are
> still batch operations that take time.
Yes, that's what I meant. Very nice.
> > By the way, is there any chance to modify stemming to process several
> > wordforms (tokens) at once, and not one-by one? That would really
> > increase speed of my external stemming.
> You can implement your own analyzer, which first caches all tokens from
TokenStream, and
> then passes them all at once to the external process.
Thanks for the hint, I'll dig in that direction.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
--
with best regards,
David Jashi
Web development EO,
Caucasus Online
+995(32)970368
David@Jashi.ge
პატივისცემით,
დავით ჯაში
ვებ–განვითარების დირექტორი
"კავკასუს ონლაინი"
+995(32)970368
David@Jashi.ge
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
David Jashi wrote:
> Wow. Does it mean we'll have live indexing out of the box?
If by "live" you mean that you can index a fetched & parsed segment, and
have it appear immediately in live search after you commit, then yes.
Other than that, Nutch still uses segments as a unit of work, so the
segment generation / fetch / parsing / updatedb etc. are still batch
operations that take time.
> By the way, is there any chance to modify stemming to process several
> wordforms (tokens) at once, and not one-by one? That would really
> increase speed of my external stemming.
You can implement your own analyzer, which first caches all tokens from
TokenStream, and then passes them all at once to the external process.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by David Jashi <da...@jashi.ge>.
Wow. Does it mean we'll have live indexing out of the box?
By the way, is there any chance to modify stemming to process several
wordforms (tokens) at once, and not one-by one? That would really
increase speed of my external stemming.
2009/2/2 Tony Wang <iv...@gmail.com>:
> I definitely like the Nutch/Solr integration the best! Thanks guys!
--
with best regards,
David Jashi
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Tony Wang <iv...@gmail.com>.
I definitely like the Nutch/Solr integration the best! Thanks guys!
Tony
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org> wrote:
> Tony Wang wrote:
>
>> that's an exciting piece of news! what's the added feature to Nutch 1.0?
>>
>
> Please see the CHANGES.txt in the nightly releases, and pick the change you
> like the best ;) There's a lot of changes and improvements, and new
> functionality.
>
> My favorites: Tika mime-type handling, new indexing framework, new scoring
> framework, Nutch/Solr integration, significant Fetcher improvements, ditto
> for redirect handling.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki <><
> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
--
Are you RCholic? www.RCholic.com
温 良 恭 俭 让 仁 义 礼 智 信
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Tony Wang wrote:
> that's an exciting piece of news! what's the added feature to Nutch 1.0?
Please see the CHANGES.txt in the nightly releases, and pick the change
you like the best ;) There's a lot of changes and improvements, and new
functionality.
My favorites: Tika mime-type handling, new indexing framework, new
scoring framework, Nutch/Solr integration, significant Fetcher
improvements, ditto for redirect handling.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Tony Wang <iv...@gmail.com>.
that's an exciting piece of news! what's the added feature to Nutch 1.0?
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org> wrote:
> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>
>> thanks
>> marko
>>
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues (9
>>> Bugs).
>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be moved
>>> to version 1.1?
>>>
>>
> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet when
> exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want to
> resolve before the release.
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki <><
> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
--
Are you RCholic? www.RCholic.com
温 良 恭 俭 让 仁 义 礼 智 信
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by dealmaker <vi...@gmail.com>.
Thank you.
I think it's a good idea to start the 1.0 release process now. There are
already several blogs that published that Nutch 1.0 will be out in Feb.
Here is http://mimblog.de/2009/02/02/nutch-release-10/ one of blogs . Many
people would love to see the 1.0 release.
Doğacan Güney-3 wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:00, Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dealmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb
>>> 28.
>>> You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I
>>> am
>>> wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
>>>
>>
>> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release date?
>> (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a paid
>> project).
>>
>> The general consensus seems to be that we should get the next release out
>> preferably sooner than later. I personally still think that the first
>> release candidate is not that far away - we have no blocker issues left
>> and
>> it seems (judged by the lack of activity on working with those remaining
>> issues) that the ones still there are not too important.
>>
>> I am going to commit NUTCH-669 soon and after that I am fine with
>> starting
>> the release process. Other devs might have different opinions.
>>
>
> +1. I will finish solr dedup tomorrow, after that I have no more
> issues I want to
> address before 1.0.
>
>> --
>> Sami Siren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sami Siren
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>>>>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> marko
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>> (9 Bugs).
>>>>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>>>>> moved to version 1.1?
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
>>>> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
>>>> to
>>>> resolve before the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Andrzej Bialecki <><
>>>> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
>>>> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
>>>> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
>>>> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Doğacan Güney
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-1.0--tp21701972p22263165.html
Sent from the Nutch - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Dennis Kubes wrote:
> The only thing I was concerned about was the new indexer framework and
> how it integrated with the Solr patches. But it turns out that while it
> doesn't integrate with solr, the functionality isn't affected either. So
> I feel good to go for a 1.0 release. +1.
I discovered today that the Solr/Nutch integration introduced some loss
of functionality too. Namely, NutchDocument that is now used instead of
Lucene Document doesn't allow to set boosts on individual fields, only a
single boost for the whole document. As it happens, I have a few custom
plugins that use this feature, and they cannot be ported to the latest
Nutch.
I will of course report it in JIRA, but it's probably too late to change
this before 1.0.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Dennis Kubes <ku...@apache.org>.
The only thing I was concerned about was the new indexer framework and
how it integrated with the Solr patches. But it turns out that while it
doesn't integrate with solr, the functionality isn't affected either.
So I feel good to go for a 1.0 release. +1.
Dennis
Doğacan Güney wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:00, Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dealmaker wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb 28.
>>> You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I am
>>> wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
>>>
>> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release date?
>> (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a paid
>> project).
>>
>> The general consensus seems to be that we should get the next release out
>> preferably sooner than later. I personally still think that the first
>> release candidate is not that far away - we have no blocker issues left and
>> it seems (judged by the lack of activity on working with those remaining
>> issues) that the ones still there are not too important.
>>
>> I am going to commit NUTCH-669 soon and after that I am fine with starting
>> the release process. Other devs might have different opinions.
>>
>
> +1. I will finish solr dedup tomorrow, after that I have no more
> issues I want to
> address before 1.0.
>
>> --
>> Sami Siren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sami Siren
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>>>>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> marko
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>>>>>> (9 Bugs).
>>>>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>>>>> moved to version 1.1?
>>>>>>
>>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
>>>> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want to
>>>> resolve before the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Andrzej Bialecki <><
>>>> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
>>>> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
>>>> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
>>>> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Doğacan Güney <do...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:00, Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> dealmaker wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb 28.
>> You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I am
>> wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
>>
>
> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release date?
> (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a paid
> project).
>
> The general consensus seems to be that we should get the next release out
> preferably sooner than later. I personally still think that the first
> release candidate is not that far away - we have no blocker issues left and
> it seems (judged by the lack of activity on working with those remaining
> issues) that the ones still there are not too important.
>
> I am going to commit NUTCH-669 soon and after that I am fine with starting
> the release process. Other devs might have different opinions.
>
+1. I will finish solr dedup tomorrow, after that I have no more
issues I want to
address before 1.0.
> --
> Sami Siren
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sami Siren
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>>>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> marko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>>>>> (9 Bugs).
>>>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>>>> moved to version 1.1?
>>>>>
>>>
>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
>>> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want to
>>> resolve before the release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrzej Bialecki <><
>>> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
>>> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
>>> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
>>> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Doğacan Güney
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Techie wrote:
> Hi All Senior Nutch Developers,
>
> Why all this hurry??? There are number of good issues yet to be
> resolved. Version 1 means, no visible issues.
What is a visible issue? The one marked as Bug & Major? We tried to
address them, and it seems to me that there's just a couple of them
left, those that don't require making broad changes to the code base.
As for the other open issues ... if they are not critical they need to
be dealt with later. We simply have to make a cut somewhere, otherwise
we will continue adding new features and tweaks indefinitely, without
ever making a release.
>
> As per my view, we can wait for one more month, instead of getting bad
> reputation. What do you all think?
We already waited one month, we even waited 1 year ... Even if we
schedule 1.1 to be released two months after 1.0 I would still vote for
pushing the 1.0 now.
If you think that there are any critical unresolved issues please let us
know _now_ - if they can be easily fixed and tested, they will be fixed
before this release.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Techie <ar...@gmail.com>.
Hi All Senior Nutch Developers,
Why all this hurry??? There are number of good issues yet to be resolved.
Version 1 means, no visible issues.
As per my view, we can wait for one more month, instead of getting bad
reputation. What do you all think?
Thanks,
Arun Sharma
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:52 AM, dealmaker <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> so, what's next? Who's in charge of the release process?
>
>
> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> >
> > Sami Siren wrote:
> >> Sami Siren wrote:
> >>> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release
> >>> date? (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a
> >>> paid project).
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> >>>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't
> >>>>> tell you yet when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining
> >>>>> issues that we want to resolve before the release.
> >> oh I now see Andrzej made some also :) .
> >
> > Yeah, yeah ... :) let's just push it out sooner than later, that's all
> > I'm saying.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrzej Bialecki <><
> > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Release-1.0--tp21701972p22270310.html
> Sent from the Nutch - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by dealmaker <vi...@gmail.com>.
so, what's next? Who's in charge of the release process?
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
> Sami Siren wrote:
>> Sami Siren wrote:
>>> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release
>>> date? (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a
>>> paid project).
>>>>
>>>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't
>>>>> tell you yet when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining
>>>>> issues that we want to resolve before the release.
>> oh I now see Andrzej made some also :) .
>
> Yeah, yeah ... :) let's just push it out sooner than later, that's all
> I'm saying.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki <><
> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-1.0--tp21701972p22270310.html
Sent from the Nutch - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Sami Siren wrote:
> Sami Siren wrote:
>> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release
>> date? (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a
>> paid project).
>>>
>>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't
>>>> tell you yet when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining
>>>> issues that we want to resolve before the release.
> oh I now see Andrzej made some also :) .
Yeah, yeah ... :) let's just push it out sooner than later, that's all
I'm saying.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
Sami Siren wrote:
> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release
> date? (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a
> paid project).
>>
>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>>
>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you
>>> yet when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that
>>> we want to resolve before the release.
oh I now see Andrzej made some also :) .
--
Sami Siren
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by dealmaker <vi...@gmail.com>.
Is it going to be days or weeks from the 1.0 release date?
Thanks.
Sami Siren-2 wrote:
>
> dealmaker wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb
>> 28.
>> You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I am
>> wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
>>
> I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release date?
> (since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a paid
> project).
>
> The general consensus seems to be that we should get the next release
> out preferably sooner than later. I personally still think that the
> first release candidate is not that far away - we have no blocker issues
> left and it seems (judged by the lack of activity on working with those
> remaining issues) that the ones still there are not too important.
>
> I am going to commit NUTCH-669 soon and after that I am fine with
> starting the release process. Other devs might have different opinions.
>
> --
> Sami Siren
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sami Siren
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>
>>> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>>>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> marko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>>>>> (9 Bugs).
>>>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>>>> moved to version 1.1?
>>>>>
>>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
>>> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
>>> to resolve before the release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrzej Bialecki <><
>>> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
>>> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
>>> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
>>> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-1.0--tp21701972p22259984.html
Sent from the Nutch - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
dealmaker wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb 28.
> You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I am
> wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
>
I think that no one else but me made any guesses about the release date?
(since it is virtually impossible due to fact that this is not a paid
project).
The general consensus seems to be that we should get the next release
out preferably sooner than later. I personally still think that the
first release candidate is not that far away - we have no blocker issues
left and it seems (judged by the lack of activity on working with those
remaining issues) that the ones still there are not too important.
I am going to commit NUTCH-669 soon and after that I am fine with
starting the release process. Other devs might have different opinions.
--
Sami Siren
--
Sami Siren
> Thanks.
>
>
> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
>> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> marko
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>>>> (9 Bugs).
>>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>>> moved to version 1.1?
>>>>
>> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
>> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
>> to resolve before the release.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Andrzej Bialecki <><
>> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
>> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
>> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
>> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by dealmaker <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Is there going to be a delay of the 1.0 release? Today is almost Feb 28.
You said that 1.0 will come in Feb. I am customizing Nutch 0.9, and I am
wondering if I should wait couple more days for the 1.0 release.
Thanks.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>
>> thanks
>> marko
>>
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>>> (9 Bugs).
>>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>>> moved to version 1.1?
>
> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
> when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
> to resolve before the release.
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki <><
> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-1.0--tp21701972p22259462.html
Sent from the Nutch - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Marko Bauhardt <mb...@101tec.com>.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is there anybody out there? ;)
>> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>>
> We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you
> yet when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that
> we want to resolve before the release.
>
>
Hi Andrzej,
thanks for the info.
Marko
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
101tec GmbH
Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
http://www.101tec.com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> is there anybody out there? ;)
> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>
> thanks
> marko
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>> (9 Bugs).
>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>> moved to version 1.1?
We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
to resolve before the release.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> is there anybody out there? ;)
> exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
>
> thanks
> marko
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33 issues
>> (9 Bugs).
>> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
>> moved to version 1.1?
We do exist. ;) We plan to release in February - I can't tell you yet
when exactly, we need to review the (few) remaining issues that we want
to resolve before the release.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Release 1.0?
Posted by Marko Bauhardt <mb...@101tec.com>.
Hi,
is there anybody out there? ;)
exists a plan when version 1.0 will be released?
thanks
marko
On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> Hi all,
> is there a timeline for the release 1.0? Currently it exists 33
> issues (9 Bugs).
> Is there a plan for a feature freeze? Maybe some big issues can be
> moved to version 1.1?
>
> Thanks for response
> Marko
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
101tec GmbH
Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
http://www.101tec.com