Fix in version 10.3.1.5 vs 10.3.2.0?

[Mamta Satoor <ms...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

When I commit a change into 10.3 codeline, what should I use for fixin
version ie 10.3.1.5 or 10.3.2.0?

I made the decision to choose 10.3.1.5 for DERBY-3178 because that is
what sysinfo showed me. Is that assumption correct? If yes, then what
is the purpose of 10.3.2.0?

I hope this is not a topic that was discussed already and I managed to
miss the discussion.

thanks,
Mamta

Re: Fix in version 10.3.1.5 vs 10.3.2.0?

[Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>]

On 11/6/07, Mamta Satoor <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I commit a change into 10.3 codeline, what should I use for fixin
> version ie 10.3.1.5 or 10.3.2.0?
>
> I made the decision to choose 10.3.1.5 for DERBY-3178 because that is
> what sysinfo showed me. Is that assumption correct? If yes, then what
> is the purpose of 10.3.2.0?
>
> I hope this is not a topic that was discussed already and I managed to
> miss the discussion.
>
> thanks,
> Mamta
>
My 2 cents: that is the approach that we basically take with candidate
releases too - for instance, with 10.3.1.0 - 10.3.1.4 we marked things
as fixed in whatever sysinfo reported, then right after cutting the
next candidate release, we bump up the last digit.
I think the purpose of 10.3.2.0 fix-in is more of a 'for the future'.
Or, maybe for scheduling?

Myrna