You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com> on 2013/09/28 00:01:47 UTC
0.96 version in apache maven repo
Hi.
Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
I am looking at
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs
supposed to go there?
Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Hi.
> Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
>
We do. Here is how to do it:
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#maven.snapshot
> I am looking at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
> and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
>
> Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs
> supposed to go there?
>
>
Snapshots are just a snapshot. I did the above for Hive fellas who wanted
to take a look at the tip of 0.96 branch.
Some folks publish every successful build as a SNAPSHOT. We don't. Our
shit too big.
RCs go elsewhere. What Elliott said. I've been trying to doc' it of late
here: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#maven.release
The script in dev-release -- make-rc.sh -- does the bulk of the publishing.
> Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
>
None. The make-rc.sh script should actually do it all for you -- just make
sure you do
./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0 0.96.0-hadoop1-SNAPSHOT
./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0 0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT
first... so you have hadoop1 and hadoop2 poms.
Scream if need help or doc needs fixing.
St.Ack
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Try w/o encrypting first to make sure that is not your issue. What you
seeing?
St.Ack
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Thanks! I got about halfway on friday, was having some troubles with the
> keys.
> There's a way to encrypt password in settings,
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html
> perhaps refguide could reference that (I hope that wasn't the cause of my
> problems). I am not sure if it works for encrypting key phrase.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > SNAPSHOT is up. Here is how I published it:
> >
> > 1008 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
> > 0.96.0-hadoop1-SNAPSHOT
> > 1009 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
> > 0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT
> > 1011 export MAVEN=~/bin/mvn/bin/mvn
> > 1012 ./dev-support/make_rc.sh
> >
> > All is predicated on your settings.xml being set up properly referencing
> a
> > key to sign the artifacts with. See the section in refguide on how to
> make
> > release candidate for guidance.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <
> sergey@hortonworks.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks! I got about halfway, at least now I have a pgp key :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <
> > > sergey@hortonworks.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
> > > > > Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of
> > 96.
> > > > So
> > > > > someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
> > > > > I can try to do it.
> > > > > Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing?
> > Seems
> > > > it
> > > > > could be useful.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > We build many times a day and each tgz is 70-80MBs. We'd probably
> make
> > > > someone upset -- it'd be my guess. Also might be awkward getting
> > > > credentials into place up on jenkins to sign the deploy.
> > > >
> > > > Let me put up a snapshot for you. Takes a little time. Will flag
> you
> > > when
> > > > done.
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks! I got about halfway on friday, was having some troubles with the
keys.
There's a way to encrypt password in settings,
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html
perhaps refguide could reference that (I hope that wasn't the cause of my
problems). I am not sure if it works for encrypting key phrase.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> SNAPSHOT is up. Here is how I published it:
>
> 1008 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
> 0.96.0-hadoop1-SNAPSHOT
> 1009 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
> 0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT
> 1011 export MAVEN=~/bin/mvn/bin/mvn
> 1012 ./dev-support/make_rc.sh
>
> All is predicated on your settings.xml being set up properly referencing a
> key to sign the artifacts with. See the section in refguide on how to make
> release candidate for guidance.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <sergey@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks! I got about halfway, at least now I have a pgp key :)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <
> > sergey@hortonworks.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
> > > > Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of
> 96.
> > > So
> > > > someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
> > > > I can try to do it.
> > > > Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing?
> Seems
> > > it
> > > > could be useful.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > We build many times a day and each tgz is 70-80MBs. We'd probably make
> > > someone upset -- it'd be my guess. Also might be awkward getting
> > > credentials into place up on jenkins to sign the deploy.
> > >
> > > Let me put up a snapshot for you. Takes a little time. Will flag you
> > when
> > > done.
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
SNAPSHOT is up. Here is how I published it:
1008 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
0.96.0-hadoop1-SNAPSHOT
1009 ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0
0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT
1011 export MAVEN=~/bin/mvn/bin/mvn
1012 ./dev-support/make_rc.sh
All is predicated on your settings.xml being set up properly referencing a
key to sign the artifacts with. See the section in refguide on how to make
release candidate for guidance.
St.Ack
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Thanks! I got about halfway, at least now I have a pgp key :)
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <
> sergey@hortonworks.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
> > > Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of 96.
> > So
> > > someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
> > > I can try to do it.
> > > Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing? Seems
> > it
> > > could be useful.
> > >
> > >
> > We build many times a day and each tgz is 70-80MBs. We'd probably make
> > someone upset -- it'd be my guess. Also might be awkward getting
> > credentials into place up on jenkins to sign the deploy.
> >
> > Let me put up a snapshot for you. Takes a little time. Will flag you
> when
> > done.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks! I got about halfway, at least now I have a pgp key :)
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <sergey@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
> > Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of 96.
> So
> > someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
> > I can try to do it.
> > Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing? Seems
> it
> > could be useful.
> >
> >
> We build many times a day and each tgz is 70-80MBs. We'd probably make
> someone upset -- it'd be my guess. Also might be awkward getting
> credentials into place up on jenkins to sign the deploy.
>
> Let me put up a snapshot for you. Takes a little time. Will flag you when
> done.
>
> St.Ack
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
> Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of 96. So
> someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
> I can try to do it.
> Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing? Seems it
> could be useful.
>
>
We build many times a day and each tgz is 70-80MBs. We'd probably make
someone upset -- it'd be my guess. Also might be awkward getting
credentials into place up on jenkins to sign the deploy.
Let me put up a snapshot for you. Takes a little time. Will flag you when
done.
St.Ack
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks! Found the vote email urls.
Yeah, the motivation is the same, looking at some recent version of 96. So
someone should publish a snapshot manually again?
I can try to do it.
Can you quality "our shit is too big" wrt every-build publishing? Seems it
could be useful.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> See the VOTE email. Along w/ pointing out where the signed tgzs are, it
> also lists a repo to use to get at the 'staged' RC up in maven (you'll need
> to add the repo to your local settings.xml, the location for local
> customization)
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <sergey@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Why isn't latest HBase build (96, or whatever) published anywhere (say as
> > snapshot)?
> > RCs would help but latest build would be even nicer.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently the 0.96 branch's version isn't a snapshot. So anything
> > > that's published directly from the pristine source will have to be a
> > > real release.
> > >
> > > Each of the RC's are put into a staging repo. Would that help you
> > > whenever we can get the next rc out ?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
> > > <se...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > > Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
> > > > I am looking at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
> > > > and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
> > > >
> > > > Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are
> > RCs
> > > > supposed to go there?
> > > >
> > > > Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
See the VOTE email. Along w/ pointing out where the signed tgzs are, it
also lists a repo to use to get at the 'staged' RC up in maven (you'll need
to add the repo to your local settings.xml, the location for local
customization)
St.Ack
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Why isn't latest HBase build (96, or whatever) published anywhere (say as
> snapshot)?
> RCs would help but latest build would be even nicer.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Currently the 0.96 branch's version isn't a snapshot. So anything
> > that's published directly from the pristine source will have to be a
> > real release.
> >
> > Each of the RC's are put into a staging repo. Would that help you
> > whenever we can get the next rc out ?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
> > <se...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
> > > I am looking at
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
> > > and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
> > >
> > > Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are
> RCs
> > > supposed to go there?
> > >
> > > Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
I.e. why cannot apache build put stuff there?
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Why isn't latest HBase build (96, or whatever) published anywhere (say as
> snapshot)?
> RCs would help but latest build would be even nicer.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Currently the 0.96 branch's version isn't a snapshot. So anything
>> that's published directly from the pristine source will have to be a
>> real release.
>>
>> Each of the RC's are put into a staging repo. Would that help you
>> whenever we can get the next rc out ?
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
>> <se...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> > Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
>> > I am looking at
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
>> > and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
>> >
>> > Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs
>> > supposed to go there?
>> >
>> > Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
>> >
>> > --
>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> entity to
>> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> reader
>> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that
>> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
Why isn't latest HBase build (96, or whatever) published anywhere (say as
snapshot)?
RCs would help but latest build would be even nicer.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> Currently the 0.96 branch's version isn't a snapshot. So anything
> that's published directly from the pristine source will have to be a
> real release.
>
> Each of the RC's are put into a staging repo. Would that help you
> whenever we can get the next rc out ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
> <se...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
> > I am looking at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
> > and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
> >
> > Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs
> > supposed to go there?
> >
> > Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo
Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
Currently the 0.96 branch's version isn't a snapshot. So anything
that's published directly from the pristine source will have to be a
real release.
Each of the RC's are put into a staging repo. Would that help you
whenever we can get the next rc out ?
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
<se...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos?
> I am looking at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/
> and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9.
>
> Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs
> supposed to go there?
>
> Any objection to me publishing a recent build?
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.