You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org> on 2003/08/29 16:01:55 UTC

Error in jk 1.2.5

if mod_jk.c, apr_strdup() is used.

But it should be :

apr_pstrdup ?


Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker a écrit :

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
> Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
> 
> 
> 
>>FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
>>and glibc 2.1.
> 
> 
> And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-).

Some old production systems are still in RH 6.2 ;)

And I was still using RH 7.2 on my developpment machine 5 weeks  ago

> I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script.



Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2


> FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
> and glibc 2.1.

And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-).

I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script.

> 
> Should we also fix this case ?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Henri Gomez a écrit :

> Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
> 
>> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
>> pending Henri's work on IPV6.  Henri, please let me know when you think
>> we are ready for another test source dist.
> 
> 
> We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
> I'll take a look at it right now.
> 
> BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it

I take a look at configure.in and if I know how to see if inet_pton 
exist via AC_CHECK_FUNCS, I don't know how to determine for in_addr_t.

Jean-Frederic may help us here since it's our resident configure guru


Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@mail.more.net>.

Henri Gomez wrote:
> Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
> 
>> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
>> pending Henri's work on IPV6.  Henri, please let me know when you think
>> we are ready for another test source dist.
> 
> 
> We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
> I'll take a look at it right now.
> 
> BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it
> 


OK, so are we ready for a test source release?

Glenn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             glenn@more.net | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :

> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
> pending Henri's work on IPV6.  Henri, please let me know when you think
> we are ready for another test source dist.

We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
I'll take a look at it right now.

BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it


Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@mail.more.net>.
FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
pending Henri's work on IPV6.  Henri, please let me know when you think
we are ready for another test source dist.

Thanks,

Glenn

Henri Gomez wrote:
> FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
> and glibc 2.1.
> 
> Should we also fix this case ?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 



in_addr_t and Linux 2.2

Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
and glibc 2.1.

Should we also fix this case ?