You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@opennlp.apache.org by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> on 2016/10/10 13:15:53 UTC
Model compatibility
Hi all,
I have OpenNLP POS models that I trained with OpenNLP 1.5.3. Can I
expect that those models will work with OpenNLP 1.6, or should I
continue using the older version of the OpenNLP libs? Thanks.
--Thilo
Re: Model compatibility
Posted by vineet verma <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys...
Are the syntaxnet models from google compatible with opennlp..?
Has anyone tried that..??
On 10-Oct-2016 18:46, "Thilo Goetz" <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have OpenNLP POS models that I trained with OpenNLP 1.5.3. Can I expect
> that those models will work with OpenNLP 1.6, or should I continue using
> the older version of the OpenNLP libs? Thanks.
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>
Re: Model compatibility
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Thanks J�rn.
On 10/10/16 16:53, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> We also document the test results. In case you would like to know a bit
> more:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/TestPlan1.6.0
>
> J�rn
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> you should expect that it works. The compatibility is tested before we
>> make release with the leipzig corpus. The output of 1.5.3 and the 1.6.0
>> version of OpenNLP must be identical, or almost identical (sometimes there
>> are bug fixes which affect the output). The test file in Leipzig corpus we
>> use has 300.000 sentences.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> J�rn
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have OpenNLP POS models that I trained with OpenNLP 1.5.3. Can I expect
>>> that those models will work with OpenNLP 1.6, or should I continue using
>>> the older version of the OpenNLP libs? Thanks.
>>>
>>> --Thilo
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Model compatibility
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
We also document the test results. In case you would like to know a bit
more:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/TestPlan1.6.0
Jörn
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you should expect that it works. The compatibility is tested before we
> make release with the leipzig corpus. The output of 1.5.3 and the 1.6.0
> version of OpenNLP must be identical, or almost identical (sometimes there
> are bug fixes which affect the output). The test file in Leipzig corpus we
> use has 300.000 sentences.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Jörn
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have OpenNLP POS models that I trained with OpenNLP 1.5.3. Can I expect
>> that those models will work with OpenNLP 1.6, or should I continue using
>> the older version of the OpenNLP libs? Thanks.
>>
>> --Thilo
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Model compatibility
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
you should expect that it works. The compatibility is tested before we make
release with the leipzig corpus. The output of 1.5.3 and the 1.6.0 version
of OpenNLP must be identical, or almost identical (sometimes there are bug
fixes which affect the output). The test file in Leipzig corpus we use has
300.000 sentences.
Hope that helps,
Jörn
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have OpenNLP POS models that I trained with OpenNLP 1.5.3. Can I expect
> that those models will work with OpenNLP 1.6, or should I continue using
> the older version of the OpenNLP libs? Thanks.
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>