Re: [PATCH] Restores delete firewall rule semantics:

["marios@redhat.com" <ma...@redhat.com>]

Hi Chris, sorry for the delay -

at first I was sceptical about the usefulness of exposing the rule URI 
since it doesn't make sense to 'retrieve' (GET) a single rule. However I 
agree that it makes sense to expose the rule URI as we have a 'DELETE 
rule_id' operation. I'll send an updated patch and will commit as soon 
as you ack that,

marios

On 30/06/11 23:44, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> On 06/27/11 - 05:22:18PM, marios@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: marios<ma...@redhat.com>
>>
>> DELETE /api/firewalls/:firewall/:rule_id
>>
>> Signed-off-by: marios<ma...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   server/lib/deltacloud/drivers/ec2/ec2_driver.rb |    2 +-
>>   server/server.rb                                |   31 ++++++++++------------
>>   server/views/firewalls/show.html.haml           |    3 +-
>>   3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> Hey Marios,
>       Sorry for the long delay here.  This patch is most of what I would like
> to see, though there is one thing missing.  In the XML for the firewall rule,
> I think we should export the URL for the rule as well, similar to how blobs
> have a full URL.  Something like this (untested) patch?
>